BUS 215 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Espresso, Fiduciary, Laurium
Document Summary
Issue = intentional infliction of emotional distress (iied) Rule = states different/amount 75 k. A = both parties are virgin island residents. Conclusion = state court / crown - . Background: (santana) wanted it to be heard in florida; (espresso) wanted it heard in illinois, where they contracted took it up on appeal. Conclusion = denied the appeal found in favor of the (espresso) Background: lhokta died of altitude related issue; mother sues geographic expeditions. Rule = arbitration is deemed valid where it is signed knowingly, willingly, and valicionally. Issue = arbitration valid? (voluntarily) and is not deemed unconscionable (favorable to one-side, duress) Conclusion = found in favor of lhokta ( ); arbitration deemed invalid. Rule = copyright infringement; arbitration is deemed valid where it is signed knowingly, willingly, and valicionally (voluntarily) and is not deemed unconscionable (favorable to one-side, duress) Conclusion = arbitration is valid found in favor of ncr ( )