PSYC 2110 Lecture Notes - Lecture 13: Tabula Rasa
PSYC 2110 Lecture 13 Notes
Introduction
Developmental Sciences
• These philosophes also diffeed o the uestio of hilde’s patiipatio i thei o
development.
• Hobbes maintained that children must learn to rechannel their naturally selfish interests
into socially acceptable outlets
• In this sense, they are passive subjects to be moulded by parents.
• Loke, too, elieed that the hild’s ole is passie eause the id of a ifat is a
blank slate on which experience writes its lessons.
• But a strikingly different view was proposed by Rousseau, who believed that children
are actively involved in the shaping of their own intellects and personalities.
• I Rousseau’s ods, the hild is ot a passie eipiet of the tuto’s istutio ut a
us, testig, otiated eploe.
• The active searching child, setting his own problems, stands in marked contrast to the
eeptie oe . . . o ho soiet fies its stap uoted i Kesse, 19, p. .
• Clearly, these philosophers had some interesting ideas about children and child rearing.
• But how could anyone decide whether their views were correct?
• Unfortunately, the philosophers collected no objective data to back their
pronouncements, and the few observations they did make were limited and
unsystematic.
• Can you anticipate the next step in the evolution of the developmental sciences?
• Children as Subjects of Study: The Baby Biographies.
• The first glimmering of a systematic study of children can be traced to the late 19th
century.
• This was a period in which investigators from a variety of academic backgrounds began
to observe the development of their own children and to publish these data in works
known as baby biographies.
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com