CS235 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Scholarly Peer Review, Nuremberg Code, Hela

33 views4 pages
13 Jun 2018
School
Course
Professor
Why does ethics matter?
“The value of research depends as much on its ethical veracity as on the novelty of its
discoveries”
What are the research ethics?
Refers to the rules on conduct carrying out research
Essential part of research conduct and integrity
Present at all stages of research: ethics is everywhere!
3 stages of research
Research design (before)
Data collection and analysis (during)
Knowledge dissemination (after)
Research Ethics
Integrity
Honesty and rigor
Accountability
Transparency
Ethics towards participants
Human participants
Human biological materials (tissues, cells, DNA)
Branches of research integrity
Fraud
Fabrication: making up data
Falsification: illegitimately manipulating data
Plagiarism: stealing other’s work
Self plagiarism: redundant publication
Mismanagement of conflict of interest
Eg pharmaceutical studies
Promote research integrity
Research activities should be:
Guided by standards, guidelines and protocols
Open to external scrutiny (scholarly peer review)
Accountable
Reflexive
Unethical research with human participants
Codes of ethics: origin
Biomedical research
Nuremberg Code (1947-49)
Declaration of Helsinki (1964)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 4 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

The value of research depends as much on its ethical veracity as on the novelty of its discoveries . Refers to the rules on conduct carrying out research. Essential part of research conduct and integrity. Present at all stages of research: ethics is everywhere! Open to external scrutiny (scholarly peer review) Syphilis patients were never informed that they had syphilis. Performed by the us public health service. Immoral, they let people die, targeted impoverished people of colour (vulnerable participants) Cells removed without henrietta"s permission, studied, sold, and resold. No informed consent, lack of respect for the person. Deception, lack of protection from psychological harm, unclear. Teachers experienced high levels of distress right to withdraw. Prisoners experienced high levels of distress, humiliation, and anxiety. Lack of protection from physical/psychological harm, dehumanizing. Ethical conduct for research involving humans - version 2. Norms of conduct that distinguish acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers