Philosophy 2810F/G Lecture Notes - Public Culture, Moral Universalism, Consequentialism

33 views4 pages

Document Summary

The argument for nationalism: who we identify with determines who we owe obligations to. So they have obligations arising out of nationality. Objection: the prior question should be "who should i identify with?" why is it right that. Conflicts? your national association is not necessarily voluntary - argument against cosmopoli- tanism - don"t have an argument for nationalism: we should let the obligations of our group acknowledges influence the obligations we personally acknowledge. Nationals say that they have special obligations to each other, therefore i should too. If there aren"t any national obligations then state obligations will be minimal (that would be bad so we should accept special obligations to fellow nationals?) Objection: this is not an argument for obligations from nationality unless its results is absurd (and it isn"t) only works if the benefits of nationalism outweigh the harms.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions