Philosophy 1305F/G Lecture 4: Philosophy 1305F/G - Lecture 4.docx

40 views2 pages

Document Summary

Revisiting st. thomas aquinas" second argument (a posteriori cosmological) Either the chain that produced frank was: infinite or finite major premise: not infinite minor premise, therefore, finite conclusion. If so, therefore there is a first cause which is an uncaused cause, which is what we mean by god. The exhaustive conclusion is that it cannot be infinite and finite this is impossible. If the beginning of everything is infinite, then the future too must be infinite. If this is true, then frank could never come to exist. If all the causes that preceded frank, frank could never exist, because there is no beginning, middle, or end. With infinity we don"t have a first, without a first we don"t have a middle, and without a middle, there is no present/end. The present is currently the end because it is what we experience now; it is the end of the line of progression that has led to frank.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions