PHI 2397 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Sissela Bok, Whistleblower, Socalled

• School: University of Ottawa
• Department: Philosophy
• Course: PHI 2397
• Professor: Sardar Hosseini

Document Summary

Accordingly, an employee must meet certain obligations of loyalty to o(cid:374)e"s (cid:272)o(cid:373)pa(cid:374)y (cid:271)efo(cid:396)e he o(cid:396) she is (cid:373)o(cid:396)ally pe(cid:396)(cid:373)itted to (cid:271)lo(cid:449) the (cid:449)histle o(cid:374) so(cid:373)e feature of the (cid:272)o(cid:373)pa(cid:374)y"s ope(cid:396)atio(cid:374) Allegedly because each act of whistle-(cid:271)lo(cid:449)i(cid:374)g is (cid:862)see(cid:374) as a violation of loyalty to o(cid:374)e"s employer. Duska, however, rejects these so-(cid:272)alled (cid:862)loyalty(cid:863) (cid:272)o(cid:374)st(cid:396)ai(cid:374)ts o(cid:374) a(cid:272)ts of (cid:449)histle-blowing. 2 views on the obligation of loyalty: employees do have obligation of loyalty to their employers. Norman bowie and sissela bok argues that the employees have an obligation of loyalty to their employers: employees have no obligation of loyalty to their employers. Ronald duska claims that employees have no obligation of loyalty to companies and corporations. He provides a simple argument: persons are the proper object of loyalty, corporations/ organizations are not persons, therefore, employees have no obligation of loyalty to their corporations (employers)