CRM 1301 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Asceticism, Intentionality, Peanut Butter

• School: University of Ottawa
• Department: Criminology
• Course: CRM 1301
• Professor: Prashan Ranasinghe

Document Summary

In what follows, i will illustrate/show this by exploring the way that these two work talk about. Ho(cid:271)(cid:271)es ratio(cid:374)alit(cid:455) i(cid:374)to s(cid:272)ie(cid:374)(cid:272)e (political science) Reaso(cid:374)s (cid:272)a(cid:374) o(cid:374)l(cid:455) (cid:272)o(cid:373)e th(cid:396)ough (cid:373)athe(cid:373)ati(cid:272)al t(cid:455)pe a(cid:396)gu(cid:373)e(cid:374)t. Hobbes provides glimpse what reasons should be (something should be reasonable) Results to (cid:272)o(cid:373)e 7+(cid:1007) = (cid:1005)(cid:1004) A logical outcome is predetermine (already determine) Because reason is nothing but reckoning (to come to know or work with) (that is adding and subtracting of the consequences of the general names agreed upon for the market and signifying of our thoughts. The first cause of absurd conclusion i lack ascribe to the want of method. Faith and reasons are not compatible with each other. Constant conflict between parliament and king & queen. Condition in man lives (state of nature) Man are created virtually equally; close to equal (in mind & body); not so considerable. Hope (important for constitution and state of nature); hope directly comes from the equality of man.