ADM 3301 Lecture Notes - Lecture 22: Carrying Cost, Stockout
31 views3 pages
1 Aug 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
> as the discount quantity goes up, the item cost goes down, but the carrying cost increases. > the objective is to minimize the total cost. > the total annual cost now includes not only the holding cost, (q/2)(h), and the ordering cost, (d/q)(s), but also the cost of purchased items. > the major trade-off when considering quantity discounts is between the reduced item cost and the increased carrying cost. > the unit holding cost, h, usually is expressed as a percent of the unit price because the more valuable the item held in inventory, the higher the holding cost is. > note that an order quantity computed in step 1 that is greater than the range that would qualify it for a discount may be discarded. Step 3&4 : compare the lowest total costs for each interval, and choose the lowest of these interval lowest costs.
Get access
Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers
Related Documents
Related Questions
The manager of a large TV store wants to begin stocking a type of remote control device. Expected monthly demand is 800 units. The remote controls can be purchased from either supplier A or supplier B. Their price lists are as follows:
Supplier A
Quantity | Unit price |
1-199 | $14.00 |
200-499 | $13.80 |
500+ | $13.60 |
Supplier B
Quantity | Unit price |
1-149 | $14.10 |
150-349 | $13.90 |
350+ | $13.70 |
Ordering cost is $40 per order and annual holding cost is 25 percent of unit price. Which supplier should be used and what order quantity is optimal if the intent is to minimize total annual cost?