ANSC 1210 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Personal Taste, Onychectomy, Animal Ethics

• School: University of Guelph
• Department: Animal Science
• Course: ANSC 1210
• Professor: Alexandra Harlander

Document Summary

Last (cid:449)eek"s dis(cid:272)ussio(cid:374: agreement that some practices probably cause pain and were likely to reduce welfare. E. g. tail docking, ear cropping, de-clawing, etc: disagreement about whether these practices should be banned. Reduce risk of injuries, chances of abandonment, etc. Better meat quality, pride of winning at dog show, etc: there is often little agreement over the following questions: Which practices should be replaced, improved, or banned: the disagreement mat in part be explained by conflicting views on. How animals should be treated (cid:862)(cid:449)hat ought to (cid:271)e(cid:863) How do we justify a moral view: a(cid:374) ethi(cid:272)al or (cid:373)oral (cid:448)ie(cid:449) is (cid:862)(cid:373)ore tha(cid:374) a feeli(cid:374)g(cid:863) or the (cid:862)e(cid:454)pressio(cid:374) of perso(cid:374)al taste(cid:863) If i sa(cid:455): (cid:862)i do(cid:374)"t like (cid:272)offee(cid:863), it is a fa(cid:272)t, i do (cid:374)ot (cid:374)eed to justf(cid:455) (cid:373)(cid:455) poi(cid:374)t of (cid:448)ie(cid:449) If i sa(cid:455): (cid:862)it"s (cid:373)orall(cid:455) (cid:449)ro(cid:374)g to dri(cid:374)k (cid:272)offee(cid:863), i do need to provide a good reason moral principle.