POL 101W Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Supreme Court Of Canada, Steven Lukes, Indian Act

• School: Simon Fraser University
• Department: Political Science
• Course: POL 101W
• Professor: Brian Thomas

Document Summary

If (cid:449)e ha(cid:448)e e(cid:448)er(cid:455)thi(cid:374)g (cid:449)e (cid:374)eed, (cid:449)e (cid:449)ould (cid:374)ot (cid:374)eed to thi(cid:374)k a(cid:271)out po(cid:449)er (cid:271)e(cid:272)ause (cid:449)e (cid:449)o(cid:374)"t need politics. It can be measured: we can quantify the results and we can actually study what we want to measure. Criticisms: the view puts the onus on not participating on the would-be loser of the contestations it seems to blame them for not fighting (do not fight back, air grivances the subordinate group) Issues are not being brought to light: because where issues are suppressed from being brought to light, agency is changed. Face two: barriers and threats: we can influence someone by influencing the process by which decision making occurs, changing the rules of the game, making threats, mobilization of bias, barriers and threats. If (cid:455)ou do(cid:374)"t (cid:449)a(cid:374)t issues to wind up in public hire people you want to do what you want. Indian act made it illegal for indigenous nations could not hire lawyers to sue the.