POL 100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 8: Nation Language, Judicial Activism, Liberal Democracy

• School: Simon Fraser University
• Department: Political Science
• Course: POL 100
• Professor: Sanjay Jeram

Document Summary

Anything can change: source of concern for human rights advocates vulnerable, others ad(cid:373)ire the uk(cid:859)s s(cid:455)ste(cid:373) of (cid:862)(cid:272)o(cid:374)stitutio(cid:374) (cid:271)(cid:455) (cid:272)o(cid:374)(cid:448)e(cid:374)tio(cid:374)(cid:863) for its fle(cid:454)i(cid:271)ilit(cid:455) a(cid:374)d responsiveness. Judicial bodies make decisions concerning the interpretation of the constitution judicial bodies are referee in democracy, evolved over time. Judicial review: the authority to strike down legislation or governmental actions that the courts deem to be in violation of the constitution judges do(cid:374)(cid:859)t (cid:373)ake the la(cid:449)s, gi(cid:448)e them the judgement for modification of laws or development. Even it does not match with public opinion but they do their job seriously by interpreting the laws and constitutions. Summary and conclusions: constitutions (forms, ideas of rules) shape the organization of power and process of law- making. Judicial review shapes the content of laws and policies: the controversy surrounding judicial activism. Russia), hard to upgrade to democratic party: sub-state nationalist parties.