CRIM 135 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Golden Rule, Statutory Interpretation, Legislative Intent

• School: Simon Fraser University
• Department: Criminology
• Course: CRIM 135
• Professor: Moira Aikenhead

Document Summary

When law is clear they determine how that law should apply to the particular facts before them; When law is unclear or ambiguous determine what the law is, How should broad/vague/unclear/ambiguous pieces of legislation be understood & applied: legislative intent. Ca(cid:374) judges (cid:396)eall(cid:455) just i(cid:374)te(cid:396)p(cid:396)et legislatio(cid:374) (cid:271)ased o(cid:374) pa(cid:396)lia(cid:373)e(cid:374)t(cid:859)s i(cid:374)te(cid:374)tio(cid:374), lea(cid:448)i(cid:374)g thei(cid:396) own opinions out of it. Assumed full intent of legislature has been set out within the wording of the statute. Assumed wording of statute alone may not be sufficient. E(cid:448)eryo(cid:374)e co(cid:373)(cid:373)its a(cid:374) offe(cid:374)ce (cid:449)ho has care or co(cid:374)trol of a (cid:373)otor (cid:448)ehicle . Intentional course of conduct associated with a motor vehicle. Circumstances create a realistic risk of danger to persons or property. Words to be read in entire context, harmoniously with scheme of the act. If a(cid:272)(cid:272)used o(cid:272)(cid:272)upies the d(cid:396)i(cid:448)e(cid:396)s seat (cid:862)the a(cid:272)(cid:272)used shall (cid:271)e dee(cid:373)ed to ha(cid:448)e had the (cid:272)a(cid:396)e.