.pf{position:relative;background-color:#fff;overflow:hidden;margin:0;border:0}.pc{position:absolute;border:0;padding:0;margin:0;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;overflow:hidden;display:block;transform-origin:0 0;-ms-transform-origin:0 0;-webkit-transform-origin:0 0}.bi{position:absolute;border:0;margin:0}.t{position:absolute;white-space:pre;font-size:1px;transform-origin:0 100%;-ms-transform-origin:0 100%;-webkit-transform-origin:0 100%;unicode-bidi:bidi-override;-moz-font-feature-settings:"liga" 0}.t:after{content:''}.t:before{content:'';display:inline-block}.pi{display:none}.d{position:absolute;transform-origin:0 100%;-ms-transform-origin:0 100%;-webkit-transform-origin:0 100%}@media screen{.pf{margin:13px auto;box-shadow:1px 1px 3px 1px #333;border-collapse:separate}}.ff1{font-family:ff1;line-height:1.432;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;visibility:visible}.ff2{font-family:ff2;line-height:1.432;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;visibility:visible}.m0{transform:matrix(.320261,0,0,.320261,0,0);-ms-transform:matrix(.320261,0,0,.320261,0,0);-webkit-transform:matrix(.320261,0,0,.320261,0,0)}.m1{transform:matrix(1.281046,0,0,1.281046,0,0);-ms-transform:matrix(1.281046,0,0,1.281046,0,0);-webkit-transform:matrix(1.281046,0,0,1.281046,0,0)}.ls0{letter-spacing:0}.sc0{text-shadow:-.015em 0 transparent,0 .015em transparent,.015em 0 transparent,0 -.015em transparent}@media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0){.sc0{-webkit-text-stroke:.015em transparent;text-shadow:none}}.ws0{word-spacing:0}.fc3{color:#000}.fc1{color:#b2b2b2}.fc0{color:#666}.fs3{font-size:4px}.fs1{font-size:56px}.fs0{font-size:80px}.y2{bottom:703.109647px}.y1{bottom:785.626928px}.y0{bottom:923.633987px}.y4{bottom:1077.306954px}.h5{height:4.592px}.h3{height:64.288px}.h1{height:65.973856px}.h2{height:91.84px}.h0{height:1078.499608px}.w1{width:513.058824px}.w0{width:762.580915px}.x0{left:124.901961px}.x2{left:149.565935px}.x1{left:189.774118px}.x4{left:374.573935px}

PSYCH 2AA3 Lecture 1: summary-chapter-135-911-15 (1)

The maladjusted mind (the university of western ontario) Distributing prohibited | downloaded by monica brekelmans (brekelmm@mcmaster. ca) lomoarcpsd|1349002 weird things &amp; its excepted; cult specific b/c violate soc norms. Consider if disease matches typical profile for disorder (prototype) to diagnose: can have disorder w/out all symptoms shown. Counseling psych (daily probs) &amp; clinical psych (severe probs) = phd, psyd, edd. Psych disorder: (cid:523)abnormal behav(cid:524): presence of 1 doesn(cid:495)t mean have psych dis: some psych (szazs) say we shouldn(cid:495)t diagnose psych dis b/c subjective on training(cid:524) but psychotherapist/therapist aren(cid:495)t protected (cid:523)used by anyone) Clinical description: combo of behav that make up dis; specify why behav isn(cid:495)t normal. Prevalence: how many ppl in pop(cid:495)n have dis. Course: pattern chronic, episodic, or time-limited; imp so we know what to expect. Etiology: origin/why dis begins (cid:523)bio/psych/soc(cid:524); effect doesn(cid:495)t imply cause (aspirin) Book doesn(cid:495)t focus on indiv theories b/c best treatment involves many.

Canada

Child Development

Psychology

Laura Cirelli

McMaster University

Regional Geography of Canada

Nursing Concepts in Health and Illness II

36. A lawyer escapes an unhappy family situation by going to a tavern. Soon she is stopping by the tavern on her way home from work every day. Avoiding her family by going to the tavern is an example of behaviour maintained by A) punishment B) classical conditioning C) extinction D) positive reinforcement E) negative reinforcement

43. Consider the following scenario: A group of psychologists are studying the genetic influence on intelligence. They find that identical twins (raised together) have a heritability coefficient of .88 and that fraternal twins (raised together) have a heritability coefficient of 42. Based solely on these findings, the psychologists can legitimately conclude that A) intelligence is entirely shaped by genetics B) intelligence is entirely shaped by the environment C) intelligence is impacted be genetics D) intelligence is not impacted by the environment E) intelligence is not at all impacted by genetics

43. Consider the following scenario: A group of psychologists are studying the genetic influence on intelligence. They find that identical twins (raised together) have a heritability coefficient of .88 and that fraternal twins (raised together) have a heritability coefficient of .42. Based solely on these findings, the psychologists can legitimately conclude that A) intelligence is entirely shaped by genetics B) intelligence is entirely shaped by the environment C) intelligence is impacted be genetics D) intelligence is not impacted by the environment E) intelligence is not at all impacted by genetics

PSYCH 2AA3 Lecture 1: summary-chapter-135-911-15 (1)

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

BIOL 1301 Lecture 4: human-biology-biol1003

BA 3340 Lecture 99: 2018 summer semester lecture1

SOEN 342 Midterm: SOEN 342 Midterm 2015 Winter

Related Questions