PSYC 332 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Twin, Twin Study, Heritability

35 views6 pages
5 PSYC 332 Feb 6th 2017
Exploring genetic vs. family influences on personality?
Temporal consistency in B5 traits
Evidence for consistency is strongonly became clear after B5 system was
introduced
Question:
What role do genes play vs. environment in developing personality traits
Heritability
Height weight movement cognitive factors all heritable
First intuition: siblings are quite similar but if you ask whether siblings are
the same in personality then usually theyre quite different
(Of course some are similar but in general extent to which siblings are
similar in personality is a lot less than physical traits)
Richard vs. Roland (Koester and his brother)
Temperament: basic signs of personalitycan tell in infancy
Some kids are easier than others…
Roland is more extraverted but theyre equal in openness, Koestner is higher
in agreeableness, Richard is lower in conscientiousness than Roland, Richard
is more Neurotic
Richard was easy Roland was difficult
Internal Locus of Control: Roland higher than Richard
^^There are other things besides the big 5, Locus of Control has to do with
our beliefs: how your behaviour relates to what happens, internal vs.
external (internal=strong contingency between what we do and outcome)
Coming back to this later
Heritability quotient:
An estimate of the proportion of variability in a given characteristic that can
be attributed to the genetic differences between people
Used to refer to a population: 90% of variability of height is genetic
Methods of exploring heritability:
Twin studies:
Fraternal twins: dizygoticonly 50% shared genetics same as siblings, this is
75% of twins
% of the time its monozygotic: share %
Collect a lot of pairs of both types of twins you can compare
Adoption studies:
Adopted vs. biological kids: 0 vs. 50% genetic connection (expect biological
siblings to be more similar than adopted)
Combined Adoption/twin studies:
Identical twins raised together vs. apart
If genetics is important: r will be higher for monozygotic vs. dizygotic
Weird similarities between id twins (news clip)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Identical twins on the big 5
N: MZ=.41 vs. DZ=.18
E: M=.55 vs. D=.23
O: M=.58 vs. D=.21
A: M=.41 vs. D=.26
C: M=.37 vs. D=.27
Generally M is about twice D correlation
On Extraversion:
In Sweden, US and Canada M were higher correlations than D
Estimate: extraversion has heritability quotient of about 50%
Strong… not as strong as physical… but strong
So is it 50/50 nature/nurture?
No:
1) Some of the variance is due to error
2) Environmental influence is two separate categories: shared vs. non-shared
Twins raised together vs. apart:
Swedish twin study
Raised with identical twin: correlation is .52, raised separately correlation is
.9… still very similar vs. DZ twins raised together=.9 vs. . for raised apart
Nature vs. nurture… nature plays a B)G part.. nurture is small effect
10x more influence from genes than nurture
Other Personality Variables?
Other than the B5
Locus of Control:
MZtogether: big 5=.47, locus of control=.28
MZapart: big 5=.40, locus of control=.02 [SHOWS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN RAISED APART AND TOGETHER BUT NOT IN B5 ONLY IN LOC]
DZtogether: B5=.19, LOC=.32
DZapart: B5=.14, LOC=.08
Locus of control is largely defined by environment not genetics…
Again: is it 50/50?
Seems wrong that genes would be so important
1:10 (e/g)
Pie chart for B5:
50% genetics
5% shared environment
20% error
25% is unspecified other than it coming from environment (not shared)
E.g. Koestner wanted to be less neuroticthought it had to do with parents
But brother and sister were not neurotic and more outgoing… shared family
traits didnt
Other choice: high school experience… sent to boarding school
Differing non-shared environmental influence… more likely
McAdams: birth order is one difference… not a shared factor
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Exploring genetic vs. family influences on personality: temporal consistency in b5 traits, evidence for consistency is strong only became clear after b5 system was introduced. Question: what role do genes play vs. environment in developing personality traits. Internal locus of control: roland higher than richard our beliefs: how your behaviour relates to what happens, internal vs. external (internal=strong contingency between what we do and outcome) 75% of twins siblings to be more similar than adopted: combined adoption/twin studies, weird similarities between id twins (news clip) If genetics is important: r will be higher for monozygotic vs. dizygotic. Identical twins on the big 5: n: mz=. 41 vs. dz=. 18, e: m=. 55 vs. d=. 23, o: m=. 58 vs. d=. 21, a: m=. 41 vs. d=. 26, c: m=. 37 vs. d=. 27, generally m is about twice d correlation. Other personality variables: other than the b5, locus of control, mztogether: big 5=. 47, locus of control=. 28, mzapart: big 5=. 40, locus of control=. 02 [shows significant difference.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents