CHEM 110 Lecture Notes - Lecture 12: Neoliberalism, Bell V Lever Brothers Ltd, Parol Evidence Rule

• School: McGill University
• Department: Chemistry
• Course: CHEM 110
• Professor: Ariel Fenster

Document Summary

In the case of an error/mistake though, the law must decide how seriously do we take the premise that ks are based on the exercise of free will. From the outset, we can make out a marked difference between the two traditions when it comes to mistake/error. If you can show (a) significant error (cid:449)hi(cid:272)h (cid:448)itiates (cid:455)ou(cid:396) (cid:272)o(cid:374)se(cid:374)t, a(cid:374)d this e(cid:396)(cid:396)o(cid:396) is(cid:374)"t (cid:894)(cid:271)(cid:895) inexcusable, then you have a good chance of getting out of contract in cvl. To get a sense of cvl, check out art. Clause that sa(cid:455)s if (cid:449)eddi(cid:374)g falls th(cid:396)ough, i"(cid:373) (cid:374)ot goi(cid:374)g to pay for the wedding band) If a(cid:374) e(cid:396)(cid:396)o(cid:396) (cid:395)ualifies u(cid:374)de(cid:396) a(cid:396)t. (cid:1005)(cid:1008)(cid:1004)(cid:1004) to gi(cid:448)e (cid:455)ou the (cid:396)ight to (cid:271)e (cid:396)eleased f(cid:396)o(cid:373) the k, the(cid:374) (cid:455)ou"(cid:396)e a(cid:271)le to get relative nullity. Extreme negligence must be found to be denied right to withdraw from contract.