ECON 1000 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Invisible Hand, Marginal Cost, Marginal Utility

65 views9 pages

amberdog154

11 Dec 2016

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

E(cid:272)o(cid:374)o(cid:373)y (cid:272)o(cid:373)es f(cid:396)o(cid:373) the g(cid:396)eek (cid:449)o(cid:396)d fo(cid:396) (cid:862)o(cid:374)e (cid:449)ho (cid:373)a(cid:374)ages a household(cid:863) A household is like an economy in how it: allocates its scare resources among its various members, takes into account each members abilities, efforts and desires. Scarcity is how society only has so many resources so it cannot provide the maximum goods and resources to please every citizens. Economists study how people make decisions, how they work, what they buy, how they save and how people interact with each other. The multitude of buyers and sellers determine the price of a good or service. 4 principles of decision making: summary: Give up efficiency so that more people can have a good standard of living. The cost of something is only what you give up to get it: Weight all the losses and gains so that you understand what you have to give up so you can get something.

Related Questions

21. The English word that comes from the Greek word for "one who manages a household" is

A- market
B- consumer
C- producer
D- economy

Question 22. 22. For a college student who wishes to calculate the true costs of going to college, the costs of room and board

A- should be counted in full, regardless of the costs of eating and sleeping elsewhere.
B- should be counted only to the extent that they are more expensive at college than elsewhere.
C- usually exceed the opportunity cost of going to college.
D- plus the cost of tuition, equals the opportunity cost of going to college.

Question 23. 23. The phenomenon of scarcity stems from the fact that

A- most economies' production methods are not very good.
B- in most economies, wealthy people consume disproportionate quantities of goods and services.
C- governments restrict the production of too many goods and services.
D- resources are limited.

Question 24. 24. Central planning refers to

A- markets guiding economic activity. Today many countries that had this system have abandoned it.
B- markets guiding economic activity. Today many countries that did not have this system have implemented it.
C- government guiding economic activity. Today many countries that had this system have abandoned it.
D- government guiding economic activity. Today many countries that did not have this system have implemented it.

Question 25. 25. Senator Brown wants to increase taxes on people with high incomes and use the money to help the poor. Senator Johnson argues that such a tax will discourage successful people from working and will therefore make society worse off. An economist would say that

A- we should agree with Senator Brown.
B- we should agree with Senator Johnson.
C- a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints.
D- there are no tradeoffs between equity and efficiency.

Question 26. 26. Max and Maddy charge people to park on their lawn while attending a nearby craft fair. At the current price of $10, seven people park on their lawn. If they raise the price to $15, they know that only five people will want to park on their lawn. Whether they have seven or five cars parked on their lawn does not affect their costs. From this information, it follows that

A- they should leave the price at $10.
B- it does not matter if they charge $10 or $15.
C- they would do better charging $15 than $10.
D- they should raise the price even more.

Question 27. 27. A circular flow diagram is a model that

A- helps to explain how participants in the economy interact with one another.
B- helps to explain how the economy is organized.
C- incorporates all aspects of the real economy.
D- Both (a) and (b) are correct.

Question 28. 28. In the markets for goods and services in the circular-flow diagram,

A- households provide firms with savings for investment.
B- households provide firms with labor, land, and capital.
C- firms provide households with output.
D- firms provide households with profit.

Question 29. 29. Incomes of U.S. households in the 1970s and 1980s

A- grew rapidly, due to the widespread success of labor unions in pushing up wages during those decades.
B- grew rapidly, due to several increases in the minimum wage during those decades.
C- grew rapidly, due to government policies that discouraged the importation of foreign products during those decades.
D- grew slowly, due to the slow growth of the output of goods and services per hour of U.S. workers' time during those decades.

Question 30. 30. For economists, statements about the world are of two types:

A- assumptions and theories.
B- true statements and false statements.
C- specific statements and general statements.
D- positive statements and normative statements.

marooncat628

1. Scarcity in economics means: we do not have sufficient resources to produce all the goods and services we want. the wants of people are limited. there must be poor people in rich countries. shortages exist in nearly all markets. You like to read Vogue and Sports Illustrated. You have only $5 to spend, so you only buy Sports Illustrated. The statement that best represents this economic concept is: resources are scarce. the real cost of something is what you must give up to get it. positive economics explains how the economy actually works. economic models are used to answer âwhat ifâ questions. . If the state government allocates additional spending on education, the opportunity cost is: zero. the dollar amount of the additional spending. considered only if additional taxes need to be raised to fund the spending. measured in terms of the best alternative use for that money. For a student that owns his or her own home and doesn't plan to live in the dorm the cost of going to college is: tuition and the cost of housing. tuition, the cost of housing, and the cost of books. tuition, the cost of books, and forgone income. forgone income only. Keynesian economics stressed: the importance of total spending. the self-correcting power of free markets. the long run. that the Depression should run its course to bring down the high cost of living. The economic policy that uses changes in government spending and taxes to affect the overall spending in the economy is known as: a tax-and-spend policy. monetary policy. fiscal policy. free-trade policy. When building a model, economists: simplify reality in order to highlight what really matters. attempt to duplicate reality in all of its complexity. ignore the facts and instead try to determine what the facts should be. are careful to avoid the scientific method. Which is a normative statement? The minimum wage has not kept pace with inflation. The minimum wage is an important tool in fighting poverty and should be increased. The minimum wage can create higher unemployment for teens and unskilled workers. A higher minimum wage is expected to increase the price of a fast-food cheeseburger. Which is an example of a positive statement? The poverty rate should be 4%. A high rate of economic growth is a more important economic goal than a low rate of unemployment. The federal government pays for 46% of U.S. health care costs. Everyone in the country should be covered by national health insurance. Economists may disagree about policies because they: may approach the issue using the same sets of values. may use different economic models. enjoy disagreeing with each other. only consider issues in positive economics.

100 word answer needed from the question and artile below.

Question:

Explain whether, and if so how, you would expect laws that prohibit the buying and selling of organs to affect the overall wellbeing of society.

Article: "Should there be a market in organs?"

Some years ago, a Boston newspaper reported the story of Susan Stephens, a woman whose son needed a kidney transplant. When the doctor learned that the mother's kidney was not compatible, he proposed a novel solution: If Stephens donated one of her kidneys to a stranger, her son would move to the top of the kidney waiting list. The mother accepted the deal and soon two patients had the transplant they were waiting for.

The ingenuity of the doctor's proposal and the nobility of the mother's act cannot be doubted. But the story raises many intriguing questions. If the mother could trade a kidney, would the hospital allow her to trade a kidney for an expensive, experimental cancer treatment that she could not afford otherwise? Should she be allowed to exchange her kidney for free tuition for her son at the hospital's mediacal school? Should she be able to sell her kidney so she can use the cash to trade in her old Toyota for a new Lexus?

In many countries, including Australia, it is illegal for a person to sell their organs. In essence, in the market for organs the government has imposed a price ceiling of zero. The result, as with any binding price ceiling, is the shortage of the good. The deal in the Stephens case did not fall under this prohibition because no cash exchanged hands.

Some countries, however, have illicit markets in organs. The World Health Organizations estimates that 10% of all organ transplants, including arount 15 000 kidneys each year, involve a patient from a rich country buying an illegal organ from a citizen of a poorer nation. The temptation to the world's poorest people to sell their 'spare' organs in high. A kidney can sell for around $1500 or more in the illegal trade. This may not sounds like much to you or me. But it can be many years income to a person living in dire poverty.

Some economists believe that there would be large benefits to allowing a free market in organs. People are born with two kidneys but they usually need only one. Meanwhile, a few people suffer from illnesses that leave them wiithout any working kidneys. Despite the obvious gains from trade, the current situation is dire. In Ausralia, the average wait for a kidney transplant is 3.8 years and there are up to 50 deaths a year from people on the waiting list because a kidney cannot be found. In Europe, on average, 12 people die each day waiting for an organ transplant. If those needing a kidney were allowed to buy one from those who have two, the price would rise to balance supply and demand. Sellers would be better off with the extra cash in their pockets. Buyers would be better off with the rgan they need to save their lives. The shortage of kidneys would disappear.

Such a market would lear to an efficient allocation of resources, but critics of this plan worry about fairness. A market for organs, they argue, would benefit the rich at the expense of the oor, because organs would then be allocated to those most willing and able to pay. But you can also question the fairness of the current system.Now, most of us walk around with an etra organ that we don't really need, while some of our fellow citizens are dying to get one. Is that fair?

ECON 1000 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Invisible Hand, Marginal Cost, Marginal Utility

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

ECON 1000 Chapter Notes - Chapter 1: Opportunity Cost, Invisible Hand, Market Failure

ECON 1000 Chapter 1-20: Principles_of_economics_mankiw_6th_editi

ECON 1000 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: E.G. Time, Opportunity Cost, Seat Belt

Related Questions