PHIL1003 Lecture Notes - Lecture 8: Logical Possibility, Natural Evil, Moral Evil

55 views2 pages
7 Jun 2018
School
Department
Course
Theodicies for the Problem of Evil
Is evil a necessary (casual) means to an end?
o For God to create any nature, there must be laws of nature. Pain is
the inevitable result of a lawful system
o Perhaps suffering is the unfortunate outcome of a set of natural
laws, even including pain, that are necessary for an ordered
universe
3A. Evil makes the world more valuable/beautiful in an aesthetic sense
(perhaps like a painting? Who would be the viewer? God? Implications of
a God who allows suffering for his/her own aesthetic enjoyment?)
3B. Evil makes the world more valuable in a moral sense (the progressive
overcoming of evil by good is valuable)
Pain & misery (natural evil) = 1st order evil
Pleasure & happiness = 1st order good
Virtue = 2nd order good
Cruelty, callousness, cowardice = 2nd order evil/moral evil
o Idea is that 1st order evil is necessary for 1st order good
o Pain & misery + virtue > pleasure & happiness (no virtue & no
natural evil)
o Perhaps Gods aim is not to minimize first order evils or maximize
first order goods, but rather to maximize second order goods
o Is virtue more valuable than pleasure?
Why suppose that virtue is more valuable than pleasure or
happiness? Perhaps God prefers virtue but we dont all have
the same taste?
But dont we as a matter of fact consider virtue more
valuable than hedonistic pleasure?
One might claim that even if virtue is not intrinsically better
than happiness, the quality of happiness one can gain from
doing virtuous deeds exceeds that of any other venture. The
best happiness logically represents virtue.
It can be conceded that some pain (natural evil) is
logically needed to experience higher-quality
pleasures, whether from virtuous or other
achievements
The problem is whether it accounts for the sheer amount of
natural evil and the existence of 2nd order evils such as
moral evil e.g. cruelty, callousness, cowardice
The Freewill Theodicy
o Perhaps we can introduce a 3rd order good freewill
o Claims that we are mistaken to attribute moral evils directly to
God
o God created humans with freewill, and moral evil arises from these
freely chosen actions by human beings
o Freewill, for the purposes of theism, must involve the capacity to
choose between two or more options in a non-deterministic or
non-random way
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents