LLB197 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Inherent Jurisdiction, Informed Consent, Family Law
Document Summary
Recently, courts have adopted a pragmatic view adopti(cid:374)g a test of (cid:858)real a(cid:374)d se(cid:374)si(cid:271)le(cid:859) (cid:894)though (cid:374)ot (cid:374)e(cid:272)essarily su(cid:271)sta(cid:374)tial(cid:895) possi(cid:271)ility of conflict occurring between the interests of both clients to maintain confidentiality: riley solicitors. Newman v phillips fox [1999] three bases to not act against a former client: breach of duty of confidence, duty of loyalty, the courts inhere(cid:374)t jurisdi(cid:272)tio(cid:374) o(cid:448)er the (cid:272)o(cid:374)du(cid:272)t of soli(cid:272)itors as (cid:858)offi(cid:272)ers of the (cid:272)ourt(cid:859). Spinicode pty ltd v look software pty ltd (2001: there is an ongoing obligation of loyalty to the client after the termination of the retainer. If a solicitor misuses privileged information they should be subject to the control of the court. Family law proceedings: where a couple split and one wants to monopolise the family lawyer. The other party may seek to have that solicitor prevented from acting if they believe they have privileged information that might be used to their detriment.
