BLAW10001 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Land Council, State Rail Authority, Divisor

36 views10 pages
15 May 2018
Department
Course
Professor
Principles of Business Law
Lecture 1
Week 6
Contractual Performance, Breach and Discharge
Performance in context
Duties of performance arise from the creation of a contract containing particular
terms
These terms give rise to legally enforceable obligations (rights and duties)
Performance of the contractual duties owed discharges them
Determining the required performance
Performance required depends on the particular terms of the contract
o Consider additional implied descriptions as well
o If all parties agree, then that is enough to satisfy the express terms of the
contract, unless there are additional or implied terms
When interpreting contractual language, the starting point is that words should be
given their ordinary and natural meaning
Role of the ourt is to deterie, o a ojetie asis, the eaig the parties
intended the words to have
o Where meaning of the words are ambiguous
Extrinsic evidence can be led to aid interpretation
courts will prefer an interpretation that is not commercially
inconvenient
courts should not take account of post-formation conduct
parties are acting in accordance with their subjective
understanding of the contract, not its objective interpretation
The effect of performance
Voluntary performance discharges the obligations
o When all the obligations are discharged, the contract is at an end
Failure to perform voluntarily is a breach of contract
breach of contract does not discharge the contract
o remedies include a payment of damages instead of performance
o right to terminate the contract
any failure to perform a contract, no matter how significant or insignificant, allows
for a payment of damages for loss as a result of the breach
Excusing performance
Parties may be excused from performing their contract if
o The contract is set aside because of the presence of a vitiating factor
Supervening impossibility/ frustration
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
o When performance is initially possible but changed circumstances then make
it impossible (or fundamentally different from what was originally envisaged)
the situatio is desried as supereig ipossiilit
Inferred from the circumstances that the contracting parties have
assumed the risk of changed conditions
Remain bound by the contract and must pay damages for non-
performance even if circumstances change to make
performance impossible
o However:
Changed circumstances render the situation radically different from
that at the time of formation
It cannot be inferred from the circumstances that the parties have
assumed the risk of changed circumstances
Party seeking relief is not responsible for the changed circumstances
Would be unjust in the new circumstances to enforce the agreement
Frustration
o The contract is disharged  frustratio ad oth parties are eused fro
further performance
Each must carry their own loss
Case Studies
Codella Construction v State Rail Authority
Held
o Both parties believed that continuous, 24/7 work would be possible
o The injunction was unforeseen as the parties had received (bad) legal advice
that such an injunction could not be issued
o The circumstances were fundamentally different as a result of the granting of
the injunction it would be much more expensive to complete the work
o Thus, the contract had been frustrated
Maritime National Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers
Facts
o MNF chartered a trawler from OT
o MNF was allocated three licences but it had hoped to operate five boats
o MNF argued that the lack of licence frustrated the contract
Held
o MNF decided how to allocate the three licences it received. The situation it
found itself in was the result of its own decision
o MNF could not rely on a situation it had brought about to claim frustration
Cotrat is disharged  frustratio ad oth parties are excused from further
performance
o Each must carry their own loss, if any
Different kinds of breach of contract
If performance is not excused, a failure by a contracting party to do what was
promised constitutes a breach of contract
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Depending on the importance of the term that is breached, a breach of contract can
be described as:
o A breach of condition
o A breach of warranty
o A breach of an innominate term
Conditions v Warranties
Conditions
o Are terms that are of fundamental importance in the agreement
Warranties
o Terms that are of lesser importance than conditions
Whether a term is a condition or a warranty
o The promise was so important that the person to whom it was made (the
promise) would not have entered the contract without it, and this was
apparent to the person making the promise (the promisor)
Parties proale itetios aout the sigifiae of particular terms are
determined objectively having regard to the terms of the contract and surrounding
circumstances
o Factors relevant in assessing whether or not a term is a condition include
Previous decisions
Language in which the obligation is described
Other terms of the contract
Likely character of the breach
Associated Newspaper v Bancks
Held
o (applying the Tramways test), the promise was an essential term. Why?
o It was held that publicity associated with prominent placement is very
important for artists, such as B thus, he would not have entered into this
otrat uless the frot page proise had ee ade
Test of essentiality
o Whether or not it appears from the general nature of the contract considered
as a whole, or from particular term of terms
Promise is of such importance to the promise that he would not have
entered into the contract unless he had been assured of a strict or
substantial performance of the promise
Bettini v Gaye
the fact that she was sick has no legal relevance
o only an explanation of the circumstances
the ter of rehearsals as a arrat, ot a oditio
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents