PSC 41 Chapter Notes - Chapter 4: Latin Square, Control Variable, Demand Characteristics

52 views3 pages
28 Aug 2018
School
Department
Course
Chapter 8
Bivariate correlation- association involving exactly 2 variables
When both variables in an association are measured on quantitative scales a scatterplot is usually
the best way to represent the data
An association with a categorical variable is best depicted with a bar graph
o Examine the difference between the group averages to see if there's an association
o Little difference = weak association between variables
When both variables are measured the study is correlational and can support an association claim
Use a t-test when at least 1 of the variables is categorical in an association claim to test if the
difference between means (averages) is statistically significant
Interrogating Association Claims
o Construct Validity
How well was each variable measured?
o Statistical Validity
Effect size- magnitude of a relationship between 2 or more variables
Larger effect sizes give more accurate predictions (errors of prediction get larger
when associations are weaker)
Larger effect sizes are usually more important
Statistical significance-conclusion that a result from a sample is so extreme that the
sample is unlikely to have come from a population in which there's no association or
no difference
p = probability sample's association came from a population in which the
association = 0
If less than 0.05 significant
The stronger a correlation the more likely it is to be statistically significant
Statistical significance depends on effect and sample size
Outlier- an extreme score that stands out far away from the pack
Outliers matter the most when a sample is small
Restriction of range- situation where there isn't a full range of possible scores on 1 of
the variables in the association so the relationship from the sample underestimates
the true correlation
Example: looking at correlation between SAT scores and college grades; college
only accepts students who have SAT score of 1800 or above so they
underestimate the true correlation
Curvilinear association- parabola relationship (increase in variable leads to increase
then decrease in another)
Correlation isn't causation
o 3 criteria for causation
Covariance of cause and effect (must be correlation between independent and
dependent variables)
Temporal precedence (independent variable must precede dependent variable)
Directionality problem
Internal validity (no plausible alternative explanations for relationship)
Third-variable problem
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
cherryberry1035 and 38883 others unlocked
PSC 41 Full Course Notes
20
PSC 41 Full Course Notes
Verified Note
20 documents

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents