LAW 4051 Chapter 9: State v Stone

36 views3 pages
22 Mar 2017
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Facts: the jury convicted stone of murder, first-degree burglary, and possession of a weapon during a violent crime. I didn"t want to be perceived by the jury as as jumping up and objecting to everything like i was trying to hide something. I considered objecting to a lot of this, but i did not feel that the objection would be sustained. Therefore, the decision not to object does not meet an objective standard of reasonableness, and stone has satisfied the first prong of strickland. His lawyers failed to place that issue before us. We find this failure does not meet an objective standard of reasonableness, and stone has satisfied the first prong of the strickland test. Thus, we find stone did not satisfy the second prong of strickland. We find trial and appellate counsel"s performance was reasonable in almost every respect.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents