KIN 107 Chapter 4: Anatomy%20Assignment%20Marking%20Rubrics
10 May 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Description and discussion are exceptionally well- structured, accurate, and logical. Tool could be implemented immediately, unchanged, for its audience. Completely clear, anatomically accurate, and meaningful to diverse learners. Description and discussion are structured, accurate, and logical. Tool could likely be implemented with very few changes for its audience. Very clear, anatomically accurate, and meaningful for most learners. Description and discussion may lack some structure, be of mixed accuracy, make some minor leaps of logic. Errors are present but do not detract from understanding. Tool could be implemented with some revision for its audience. Meaningful to at least a subset of intended learners. Relies on sources some of which may be questionable, mostly cited accurately. Tool could be implemented only with major revision. Meaningful to only a very few intended learners. Relies on mostly inappropriate resources and/or poorly cited. Report incomplete, or very poorly presented and written. No resources or only inappropriate resources, poorly cited.
