Read martin luther kings letter from birmingham jail and answer this question

1. do you agree with the distinction king makes between “just” and “unjust” laws in “Letter from Briningham jail?”

Answer these questions thoroughly

1. Define law and defend why your definition of law is the better definition. (worth five marks)

2. Explain how the study of law/jurisprudence can be compared to an iceberg? (worth five marks)

3. Martin Luther King in his “ letter from Birmingham Jail”, Al Pacino, in his famous “Justice for All” speech, and Michael Waltzer, provide their own a definition of justice. Do you agree with their definition of justice? Why or why not? (worth 10 marks)

I am writing a reflection paragraph about immanuel kant and the reflection is about why i agree with this philosopher the most.

STEP 1: Write me a very good thesis statement (or a few options I can pick from) that: declares an opinion, rather than an obvious fact, make sure the language in the thesis is clear enough for readers to understand, make sure the relationship between the topic sentence and the thesis is clear, make sure the thesis is focussed and narrow rather than vague and broad, make sure you have enough evidence to prove your thesis.

STEP 2: POINT PROOF EXPLANATION FORMAT:

Point- the supporting point of your thesis statement

Proof- to convince the reader that your point is true invalid you must apply at least one prove to convince them of your claim. Prove consist of both direct evidence (short and long quotations) and indirect evidence (observation and reason). The best argument combine both direct and indirect evidence.

Explanation- the relationship between your supporting points, and the proves that you offered to defend it is not obvious or automatic. Each proof, therefore, must be clearly explain so that it is relevant for the supporting point and more broadly the thesis becomes clear, to your reader. Also, be sure to show the relationship between proofs.

So pick three points to support your thesis, and then pick three proofs from immanuel Kants categorical imperative reading to support your points, and then, after each point, explain how old is proof supports the point (briefly with strong words)

So formatting should be like this

Point 1-

Proof (direct or indirect)-

Explain how this proof supports the point-

And repeat same for other two points.

STEP 3: CONCLUSION:

gently remind the reader of your thesis by paraphrasing it, using slightly different words for maintaining the original meaning (make sure it’s good)

then paraphrase, organizing points remind your reader of the three points you have developed to support your thesis. Also, be sure that the supporting points are repeated in the order that they appear in your reflective writing piece.

STEP FOUR: THEMATIC STATEMENT:

The thematic statement  compels your reader to consider why this topic is worthy of reflection what is a social, personal and political relevance? It’s a challenge, the reader to reconsider their views about the topic being addressed (answer the question: SO WHAT).

After you are finished, all of this, combine everything and write a reflective piece on it (you can add additional information to make it better)

Based on the text above, answer these questions

1. do you think that morally, the mother’s actions in this case was the right course of action?

2. Do you think that the mothers actions in this case is legal?

3. How would these philosophers (Jeremy Bentham, St. Thomas Aquinas, Joseph Fletcher, and Immanuel Kant) justify or oppose the mother’s actions in this case scenario?