11
answers
0
watching
34
views
23 Nov 2019
A dressmaker can sew 1,300 garments with 200 bolts of fabric and 2,300 hours of labor. Another dressmaker can sew 1,300 garments with 100 bolts of fabric and 3,000 hours of identical labor. Fabric costs $110 a bolt and labor costs $30 an hour.
a. Is it possible for both methods to be technically efficient? Why or why not?
- Yes, because neither dressmaker is using more of both inputs to produce the same number of garments. - Yes, because both dressmakers make the same number of garments. - No, because the first dressmaker uses 2,300 hours of labor while the second dressmaker uses 3,000 hours of labor. This means that the first dressmaker has higher productivity and therefore is the only one who is technically efficient. - No, because the cost of the garments for the first dressmaker is $91,000. The cost of the same number of garments for the second dressmaker is $101,000. Therefore, the first method is technically efficient.
b. Is it possible for both methods to be economically efficient? Why or why not?
- No, because the second method has lower total costs of production. - Yes, because even though their costs differ, the higher-cost dressmaker may be able to sell the garments at a higher price. - Yes, because the dressmakers will sell the garments for the same price. - No, because the first method has lower total costs of production.
A dressmaker can sew 1,300 garments with 200 bolts of fabric and 2,300 hours of labor. Another dressmaker can sew 1,300 garments with 100 bolts of fabric and 3,000 hours of identical labor. Fabric costs $110 a bolt and labor costs $30 an hour.
a. Is it possible for both methods to be technically efficient? Why or why not?
- | Yes, because neither dressmaker is using more of both inputs to produce the same number of garments. |
- | Yes, because both dressmakers make the same number of garments. |
- | No, because the first dressmaker uses 2,300 hours of labor while the second dressmaker uses 3,000 hours of labor. This means that the first dressmaker has higher productivity and therefore is the only one who is technically efficient. |
- | No, because the cost of the garments for the first dressmaker is $91,000. The cost of the same number of garments for the second dressmaker is $101,000. Therefore, the first method is technically efficient. |
b. Is it possible for both methods to be economically efficient? Why or why not?
- | No, because the second method has lower total costs of production. |
- | Yes, because even though their costs differ, the higher-cost dressmaker may be able to sell the garments at a higher price. |
- | Yes, because the dressmakers will sell the garments for the same price. |
- | No, because the first method has lower total costs of production. |
OC4883347Lv10
31 May 2023
Unlock all answers
Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
lalithashwin156Lv10
31 May 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
vickkyjayLv10
31 May 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
OC4218648Lv10
27 May 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
samvicLv10
20 May 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
akunuru639Lv10
9 May 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
viclere2005Lv10
9 May 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
OC4396189Lv10
23 Apr 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
bingoLv10
22 Apr 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
mainLv10
22 Apr 2023
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
Keith LeannonLv2
10 Jan 2019
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in