Suppose is defined as below. Over the interval there is no point where the derivative equals zero. Why doesn't Rolle's Theorem apply to this situation?

,

Booster class

Calculus 1

Skill

Apply Rolle's Theorem

answer

watching

197

views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

You have 0 free answers left.
Get unlimited access to 3.8 million step-by-step answers.

Get unlimited access

Already have an account? Log in

Zhen ZhuLv5

13 Jul 2020

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.

Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

Consider the graph shown below.

Apply Rolle's Theorem for the function at the interval to find all the values of where .

4. (16 pts) MULTIPLE CHOICE! CIRCLE THE CORRECT ANSWER IN EACH PART. (I) ( 4 pts) Complete the statement of the Intermediate Value Theorem: Suppose f is continuous on the interval [a, b] and L is a number between f (a) and f (b). Then there is at least one number c in (a, b) such that (a) C = L; (b) f(c) = 0; (c) f(c) = L; (a) f' (c) = L; (e) C = 0; (f) f (a) < c < f (b); (g) NONE OF THE PREVIOUS ANSWERS. (II) (4 pts) The figure shows the graph of a function f. At what point (points) c does the conclusion of the Intermediate Value Theorem hold for f (x) on the interval [1, 5] and L = 2. --- - - - -1 - - - 2 - - I- - - (a) c = 1; (b) C = 0; (c) C = 2; (a) c = 3; (e) C = 4; (f) C = 5; (g) c= -1. (III) (4 pts) Given that cos x s f (x) s et, for all x > 0 evaluate lim f (x) x+0+ (a) lim f (x) = 0; (b) lim f (x) = 1; (c) lim f (x) = e; x0+ X0+ (d) lim f(x) DOES NOT EXIST. WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO ANSWER THE QUESTION *40+ (IV) (4 pts) Given the function 1 f (x) = , find its inverse, f+(x) x -2 (a) f (x) = x -2; (b) f«+ (x) = x+2 ; (c) fº+ (x) = -2; (f) f-+ (x) -2; (e) f (x) DOES NOT EXIST.

5. (18 pts) Circle True if the statement is ALWAYS true; circle False otherwise. No explanations are required. Let f be a one-to-one function and f its inverse. (a) If the point (2, 5) lies on the graph off, then the point (5,2) lies on the graph of f. True False f (2) = 5 f-1 (5) = 2 (b) sin-1 (T) = 0 True False Since >1, ris not in the domain of sin-?; | or sin-1 (7) #0, since sin (0) = 0 # Iff and g are two functions defined on (-1, 1), and if (c) limg (x) = 0, then it must be true that lim[ f(x) g (x)] = 0. True False Let f (x) = 1 / x, if x #0, and f (0) = 4 and g(x) = x. Then lim g (x) = lim (x) = 0, but Lim ( f (x) g(x)] = lim [() x] = 18 0. Iffis continuous on (-1, 1), and if f (0) = 10 and lim g (x) = 2, (a) True False then lin (= 5. Because lim : (*) - Limx-of (*) .f(0) = 20 = 5 If f is continuous on [1, 3], and if f(1) = 0 and f(3) = 4, then the equation f(x) = (e) has a solution in (1, 3). True False Since f continuous on [1, 3), f(1) = 0 < < 4 = f (3), by the Intermidiate Value Theorem there exists a cin (1, 3) such that f (c) = . (f) Let f be a positive function with vertical asymptote x = 5. Then lim f (x) = +0. True False Let f (x) = 1, if x < 5, and f (x) ==, ifx>5. Then lim f (x) = +00, and therefore, X = 5 is a vertical asymptote. 5 - X So, f is a positive function with vertical asymptote x = 5 but lim f (x) + +co, since lim f (x) = + 0 + lim f (x) = 1, which means that lim f (x) does not exist.

Weekly leaderboard

Home

Homework Help 3,900,000

Mathematics 240,000

Suppose is defined as below. Over the interval there is no point where the derivative equals zero. Why doesn't Rolle's Theorem apply to this situation? ,

Unlock all answers

Related questions

Weekly leaderboard

Suppose is defined as below. Over the interval there is no point where the derivative equals zero. Why doesn't Rolle's Theorem apply to this situation?

,