3
answers
0
watching
191
views

Problem 11-15
NPV profiles: timing differences

An oil drilling company must choose between two mutually exclusive extraction projects, and each costs $12.2 million. Under Plan A, all the oil would be extracted in 1 year, producing a cash flow at t = 1 of $14.64 million. Under Plan B, cash flows would be $2.1678 million per year for 20 years. The firm's WACC is 12.6%.

Construct NPV profiles for Plans A and B. Round your answers to two decimal places. Enter your answers in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55.

Discount Rate NPV Plan A NPV Plan B
0% $ {C} million $ {C} million
5 $ {C} million $ {C} million
10 $ {C} million $ {C} million
12 $ {C} million $ {C} million
15 $ {C} million $ {C} million
17 $ {C} million $ {C} million
20 $ {C} million $ {C} million



Identify each project's IRR. Round your answers to two decimal places.
Project A

%
Project B

%

Find the crossover rate. Round your answer to two decimal places.

%

Is it logical to assume that the firm would take on all available independent, average-risk projects with returns greater than 12.6%?
-Select-yesnoItem 18

If all available projects with returns greater than 12.6% have been undertaken, does this mean that cash flows from past investments have an opportunity cost of only 12.6%, because all the company can do with these cash flows is to replace money that has a cost of 12.6%?
-Select-yesnoItem 19

Does this imply that the WACC is the correct reinvestment rate assumption for a project's cash flows?
-Select-yesnoItem 20


Hide FeedbackShow All Feedback

Check My Work Feedback

Post Submission Feedback

Solution

Check My WorkCheck My Work (1 remaining)

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
Bunny Greenfelder
Bunny GreenfelderLv2
28 Sep 2019
Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

Weekly leaderboard

Start filling in the gaps now
Log in