Which branch of Economics is most likely to study differences in countries' growth rates?

Select one:
a. microeconomics
b. normative economics
c. macroeconomics
d. experimental economics

answer

watching

150

views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

You have 0 free answers left.
Get unlimited access to 3.8 million step-by-step answers.

Get unlimited access

Already have an account? Log in

Chika IlonahLv10

9 Nov 2020

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.

Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

What are the three stages of production in economics?

Normative economics aims to determine people's desirability or the lack thereof to various economic programs, situations, and conditions by asking what should happen or what ought to be. Therefore, normative statements typically present an opinion-based analysis in terms of what is thought to be desirable. For example, stating that the government should strive for economic growth of x% or inflation of y% could be seen as normative.

bluereindeer374

Explain the difference between positive and normative economics and how this affects ethical decision making.

Briefly define the following two terms in your own words: Positive economics Normative economics

For the sake of argument assume that global warming is a fact, caused by human activity and that it can be fixed by taxing producers for the amount of carbon they release. The problem is that this tax would greatly increase costs for everyone. How would this situation be described in terms of Positive economics? How would this situation be described in terms of Normative economics? Which of these do you think is the correct way to describe this situation and why?

rosehound361

Explain the difference between positive and normative economics and how this affects ethical decision making.

Briefly define the following two terms in your own words: Positive economics and Normative economics.

For the sake of argument, assume that global warming is a fact, caused by human activity and that it can be fixed by taxing producers for the amount of carbon they release. The problem is that this tax would greatly increase costs for everyone. How would this situation be described in terms of Positive economics? How would this situation be described in terms of Normative economics? Which of these do you think is the correct way to describe this situation and why?