🏷️ LIMITED TIME OFFER: GET 20% OFF GRADE+ YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION →
Log in
Economics
11
answers
0
watching
298
views
13 Dec 2017

17. Greater inequality of outcomes can lead to more wealth creation A. but only if the additional wealth created is shared equally B. because it can motivate hard work and investment C. because it motivates lobbying against bad policy decisions D. All of the above

word_media_image1.png
Watch
11
answers
0
watching
298
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Already have an account? Log in
Share
Deanna Hettinger
Deanna HettingerLv2
14 Dec 2017
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Principles of Economics
2nd Edition, 2017
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172364
Principles of Macroeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172388
Principles of Microeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172340

Related questions

WRITE a one-sentence summary of each paragraph!

The False Income-Inequality Narrative

BY JASON L. RILEY

Published in the Wall Street Journal on Sept. 29, 2015

An enduring theme of the Democratic presidential race has been income inequality, coupled with an enduring belief that America's affluent reached their status at the expense of the poor and the middle class.

Bernie Sanders speaks of little else on the stump. And when not busy dissembling on her handling of email correspondence at the State Department, Hillary Clinton will tell you that the deck is still stacked in favor of those at the top. If Joe Biden gets in, expect more of the same. The vice president is said to be contemplating a 2016 bid in large part because struggling middle-income families may have trouble relating to Mrs. Clinton on inequality given her high living since leaving the White House.

This theme, in any case, seems to resonate with voters, which is no huge shock in the sixth year of an economic recovery. Envy and resentment fuel class warfare and lackluster economic growth throughout the Obama presidency have made people less optimistic and more inclined to fault others for their circumstances. A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll this week reports that four-in-five Americans “were either angry because our political system seems to only be working for the insiders with money and power or anxious and uncertain. After all, the economy still feels rocky and unpredictable or both.

Liberals want to address income disparities through wealth redistribution by taking money from more productive people and giving it to the less productive in the name of fairness as the left defines it. They want to raise income taxes, expand the welfare state, lift minimum wages, and strengthen the bargaining power of unions. Mr. Sanders has been the most explicit about this, even going so far as to propose a wealth tax. Our economic goals have to be redistributing a significant amount of [wealth] back from the top 1%, the senator said in July.

In reality, the left has overstated the problem. And all the focus on divvying up existing wealth instead of creating more risks making matters far worse for the people they are trying to help and the country in general. To the extent that the expanding welfare state allows more people to live without working and therefore without earning income or developing their own human capital—supporters of the welfare state are contributing to the very income disparities they so much decry, writes economist Thomas Sowell in his new book, “Wealth, Poverty and Politics.

Mr. Sowell is the author of more than 30 books over the past four decades, many having to do with what drives different social and economic outcomes among different groups in the U.S. and elsewhere. In his latest tome, he draws from this well of research to do what he has done so well for so long: question basic assumptions behind public policy and follow the facts where they lead him.

One common assumption is that proportionate or random outcomes are the natural order of things and that gaps or disparities are evidence of something wrong. In fact, huge disparities are the norm, not the exception, because the demographic, cultural, and political factors that influence the development of the human capital that makes people productive also tend to be unequal.

In 2013, only 9% of U.S. women with college degrees who gave birth were unmarried, versus 61% of women who were high-school dropouts and unmarried. Harvard's Robert Putnam reports that children from professional families will hear 19 million more words than their working-class peers before the first day of kindergarten.

These children don't have the same prospects. Equal opportunity, in the sense of being judged and rewarded by the same standards as others, cannot possibly mean equal life chances for children born and raised in these very different settings,writes Mr. Sowell. The fact that life is unfair is not the same as saying that a particular institution, or a particular society, is unfair.

The argument that social mobility is a thing of the past in the U.S. also is disputable. Longitudinal studies by the IRS and others that measure the progress of individuals over time show that the American dream is alive and well. One such paper, published by the Pew Charitable Trusts in 2012, measured whether a person has more or less income, earnings, or wealth than his or her parents did at the same age and concluded that the vast majority of Americans had higher incomes, while 50% had greater wealth.

In other studies, Pew has found generational stagnation but the authors have noted that it didn't apply to immigrants. If low-income immigrants can rise even when the native-born don't, writes Mr. Sowell, that strongly suggests that American society continues to offer opportunities to move up economically, but that not all groups make the same use of these opportunities.

Mr. Riley, a Manhattan Institute senior fellow and Journal contributor is the author of Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed (Encounter Books, 2014).

2. If the government decides to levy a small excise tax on the buyers in a perfectly competitive market in which the elasticity of demand is greater than the elasticity of supply, then we can conclude that: (A) The buyers will bear all of the tax (B) The sellers will bear all of the tax (C) The buyers will bear more of the tax than sellers ((D) The sellers will bear more of the tax than buyers YE) The government will bear most of the tax (F) It is not possible to tell who will bear most of the tax without additional information (G) The tax will be shared equally between the buyers and the sellers (H) There will be a smaller amount of excess burden than there would have been if the elasticity of supply is greater than the elasticity of demand (I) all of the above (J) none of the above

17) If the economy is in a long-run equilibrium when the Federal Reserve decides that its inflation target is too low and chooses to raise it, ________.

A) monetary policy would ultimately lead to higher potential output but real interest rates and inflation would be unaffected in the long run

B) monetary policy would ultimately lead to higher inflation but real interest rates and potential output would be unaffected in the long run

C) monetary policy would ultimately lead to higher interest rates but potential output and inflation would be unaffected in the long run

D) monetary policy would ultimately lead to higher interest rates, potential output, and inflation in the long run

 

18) A federal government deficit is said to exist in the event that ________.

A) federal outlays are less than federal revenues.

B) federal outlays are equal to federal revenues.

C) federal outlays are greater than federal revenues.

D) any of the above conditions exists.

 

19) Private saving + Government saving equals ________.

A) Taxes + Investment

B) Output minus Consumption

C) Government capital + human capital

D) Investment + Net exports

Related Documents

ECO 2117 Lecture Notes - Lecture 14: Human Capital, Opportunity Cost, Institute For Operations Research And The Management Sciences
crimsongoat0
ECO 1305 Lecture Notes - Lecture 20: Externality, Human Capital, Tacit Knowledge
indigotermite377
ECO 2013 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Real Interest Rate, Price Level, Government Spending
sangriaarmadillo796

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Economics 400,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in