Log in
Economics
1
answer
0
watching
54
views

The ECB has tackled Anti-Trust cases more than the FTC has during recent years. Why is that? Name a case they recently rejected? Why did they reject it?

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
54
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Kritika Krishnakumar
Kritika KrishnakumarLv10
28 Sep 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Principles of Economics
2nd Edition, 2017
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172364
Principles of Macroeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172388
Principles of Microeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172340

Related questions

6) Testifying at a price fixing trial involving Cargill Corp. and the market for chicken growth hormone, (in which the Cargill is one of only three firms worldwide), an executive for Perdue said: "It's an oligopoly. When one (firm) changes price, they all do…Usually within minutes."

Why is it not surprising to find that in an oligopoly, which sells a basically undifferentiated product like chicken growth hormone all the firms change prices simultaneously, even if there is no explicit price fixing? In another words, what specific price strategy of Oligopoly marketing was practiced in this case?

In the similar context, on July 8, 2015, the US Department of Justice has filed multiple counts of lawsuits against 4 major airlines companies accusing them on violation of Anti-Trust legislation for price fixing scheme during the 4th of July holiday flights. These four airlines are SW Airlines, Delta, American, and the United who collectively control over 80% of all domestic passenger seats across the country. What specific type of price fixing does this accusation relate to the topics you have studied in this course? How is this case different than the example of Cargil Corporation stated above? Be very brief.

1. What is a natural monopoly?

a) Why is it the case that the market system cannot deliver a sustainable competitive equilibrium
in the case of a natural monopoly€.

b) What, in your view is likely to be the most attractive option for how the government should
deal with cases of natural monopoly?

c) Why does this option strike you as more attractive than the other options you can think of?

Thanks!

Paralegal Studies

Test Four

50 points - Due before 11:00 p.m. Monday

Section One
10 points

Use Westlaw® to locate the following case and provide the complete citation:

579 F.2d 1200

1. Name the prevailing parties in the trial court proceeding.

2. Name the trial court. Also name the appellate court.

3. What kind of case is it?

4. In your own words, provide a summary of the facts of the case

5. What are the issues on appeal?

6. Who wrote the opinion?

7. What is the docket number?

8. On what date did the court issue the decision and how did the court rule?

9. Provide the text of Headnote [6] as well as the name of the author referenced in the portion of the text which is summarized by that headnote.

10. Provide the name of the attorney or attorneys who represented the appellants.


Section Two
15 points

Using Westlaw® KeyCite the following case:

Parker v. State of Oklahoma, 556 P.2d 1298 (Okla. Crim. App. 1976).

A) How many citing references does the case provide?

B) Has a Maryland case cited the Parker case? If so, provide the case citation for the citing case.

C) Has a Connecticut case cited the Parker case? If so, provide the citation for the citing case.

D) How many of the citing cases are no longer good law? Provide the citation to the case or cases.

E) Have any legal encyclopedias cited Parker? If so, provide the citation to each of the articles.


Section Three
5 points

Your attorney has asked you to determine whether any cases have cited Headnote [6] as referenced in Question 9 of Section One above.

Using proper citation, please provide any citing references you have located.

Please describe your process for locating this information.

Section Four
5 points

Complete assignment 11.7 on page 532 in Statsky.

Section Five
5 points

Complete assignment 13.8 on page 586 in Statsky

Section Six
10 points

Use Your Appellate Brief Scenario to answer this section

Phrase the legal issue or issues as they will be raised on appeal.

Using Westlaw®, locate, correctly cite and provide a summary of at least one mandatory court opinion that you can argue in Kant’s appeal.

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Economics 400,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in