Log in
Economics
1
answer
0
watching
91
views

Using your understanding of economic theory and any relevant empirical evidence, assess the potential work incentive effects of replacing existing means-tested benefits with a plausible UBI scheme in a country like the UK, illustrating your answer with an appropriate diagram or diagrams.

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
91
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Chika Ilonah
Chika IlonahLv10
28 Sep 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Principles of Economics
2nd Edition, 2017
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172364
Principles of Macroeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172388
Principles of Microeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172340

Related questions

Case 6

Although the use of mobile communication devices by motor vehicle drivers is a dangerous practice, studies have shown that up to 80% of motor vehicle accidents in in Bubble Country are caused by this practice. Surveys have shown that even though drivers recognize that this is a dangerous practice, they cannot resist the temptation of using the devices. The surveys also found that individuals who regularly use their mobile devices while driving do not consider fines to be deterrent. The percentage of accidents attributable to driver distraction caused by the use of mobile communication devices has been increasing by 2% per year. A risk assessment has shown that the risk of having an accident for a driver using their mobile devices is 15%. Public opinion research suggests that the public is more concern about this issue than drinking and driving and would like the government to address it. Last year there were 20,000 motor vehicle accidents attributed to driver distraction in Bubble Country because of mobile communication device use.

In order to address the issue, the government of Bubble Country is considering a policy that will force car makers to install remote equipment in all cars to ensure that mobile communication devices cannot be used when driving. Such equipment is already available and it will cost car makers $12 to install such equipment in each car. The policy will also make it illegal to use a mobile communication device while driving and individuals found doing this will be given a fine of $800.

Part I:

Based on what you’ve learnt from this course, and your understanding of project evaluation,

A) Describe or summarize what you understand the issue to be (5)

B) What do you think should be the objective and sub-objectives? (5)

C) Do you see a rationale for public sector involvement? Explain (5)

D) Discuss the potential benefits? Be comprehensive (10)

E) Discuss the potential cost? Be comprehensive (10)

F) Are there any external impacts? Explain (5)

G) Identify the stakeholders and describe who are the winners and losers? (10)

Part II:

With the information above and any additional information you can find and your own reasonable assumptions, undertake a rough cost benefit analysis

A) How will you quantify and monetize all your identified (10)

1) Costs

2 ) Benefits

3) What time frame will you use and why?

B) With a spreadsheet estimate (30)

1) The Present Value Cost – Economic

2) The present Value Benefits – Economic

3) Discuss any qualitative costs and benefits

C) With the following criteria, determine whether the project is economically feasible (10)

1) Net Present Value Criteria

2) Benefit Cost Ratio

Because sports facilities are not expected to generate additional net output in a metropolitan area and no systematic empirical analysis ever finds evidence that they do, sports facilities cannot be counted on to augment tax collections. Indeed, public expenditures occasioned by operating a sports facility generally exceed revenues generated by it. To assess the budgetary impact of a new facility, however, it is necessary to know the financing and lease terms. If the financing burden is large and falls primarily on public coffers and if the lease terms are concessionary to the team, then the public obligation for debt service, infrastructure maintenance, environmental remediation, incremental sanitation and security expense, probable cost overruns, and subsequent facility enhancement is likely to generate a substantial budgetary hole in the municipal, county and/or state accounts. Such budgetary gaps must be filled either with decreased government services or with higher taxes; either will produce a drag on the local economy. Unfortunately for host cities, the monopoly status of the major team sports leagues has enabled the teams to drive impressive bargains in negotiating financing and lease terms. Even as sports facilities have grown more and more expensive, in some cases costing over half a billion dollars, public contributions to construction costs have continued to average nearly 70 percent. Quirk and Fort (1992, pp. 170-171), after studying 25 facilities built between 1978 and 1992, concluded that the host cities provided on average a $7 million per year operating subsidy to the team. In none of the cases did the host city receive a positive net operating income from the facility. The perverse influence of the 1986 Tax Reform Act on lease terms described above and the escalating costs of recent facility construction suggest that the size of these subsidies has only grown since 1992. Promotional economic impact studies often claim that an additional positive economic stimulus is derived from the actual construction of the sports facility. The problem with this contention is that the funds to build the stadium or arena have an opportunity cost. If the construction is funded by the city, then the city must raise the money via higher taxes or reduced services. Spending on construction thereby causes lower spending by the government in other areas or lower disposable household income. If stimulating a local economy were so simple, every municipal government could guarantee full employment with a public works program that hired workers to dig holes in the ground and then hired other workers to fill the holes. Only in the case where some of the funding comes from state or federal coffers can the city expect to experience a net job gain from facility construction, and in this case, the gain comes at the expense of worker layoffs elsewhere in the state or country. The logical implications of both multiplier and budget impact analysis are consistent with the results of empirical studies that fail to detect any discernible effects on local economic growth associated with a sports facility or a team.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. They argue that the lack of economic benefits is due in part to the budgetary impact of the stadium construction. What do they mean? Explain your answer with sufficient detail to convince me you read that part of the article

Microeconomics Multiple choice questions. Please answer all the questions.

1. Scarcity:
A. exists because resources are limited while human wants are unlimited.
B. means we are unable to have as much as we would like to have.
C. will likely be eliminated as technology continues to expand.
D. is not an issue addressed in economics.

2. People are forced to make choices because of:
A. unlimited wants and unlimited resources.
B. limited wants and unlimited resources.
C. unlimited wants and limited resources.
D. limited wants and limited resources.
E. irrational wants and limited resources.

3. Which of the following is closest to the definition of capital?
A. c and e.
B. c and d.
C. Tools, equipment, means of transportation
D. Factories and machinery.
E. Borrowed money.

4. Which one of the following is the most accurate definition of economics?
A. Economics is the study of stocks and bonds.
B. Economics is the study of how people allocate unlimited resources.
C. Economics is the study of how consumers choose to spend their income.
D. Economics is the study of how society chooses to allocate scarce resources.

5. The basic difference between macroeconomics and microeconomics is:
A. microeconomics concentrates on individual markets while macroeconomics focuses primarily on international trade.
B. microeconomics concentrates on the behavior of individual consumers while macroeconomics focuses on the behavior of firms.
C. microeconomics concentrates on the behavior of individual consumers and firms while macroeconomics focuses on the performance of the entire economy.
D. microeconomics explores the causes of inflation while macroeconomics focuses on the causes of unemployment.

6. Which of the following is not a resource?
A. Land.
B. Labor.
C. Money.
D. Capital.

7. Which of the following would an economist classify as capital?
A. 100 shares of Microsoft stock.
B. $50 bill.
C. credit card.
D. lawyer's personal computer.

8. Economics, according to its definition, studies how people:
A. earn and spend money.
B. invest in the stock and bond markets.
C. make choices in the face of scarcity.
D. supply goods in response to demand.

9. Which of the following is the best example of a microeconomic topic?
A. The impact that the money supply has on inflation.
B. The reasons for increases in the price of soft drinks.
C. The effect that federal budget deficits have on the interest rate.
D. The tradeoff between inflation and unemployment.

10. Which of the following is a macroeconomics topic?
A. Wages of textile workers in the Northeast.
B. The cost of producing 10,000 bookcases.
C. The economy's annual growth rate.
D. National demand for fish.
E. Effects of farm subsidies on food prices.

11. An economic theory claims that a rise in gasoline prices will cause gasoline purchases to fall, Ceteris paribus. The phrase "Ceteris paribus" means that:
A. other relevant factors like consumer incomes must be held constant.
B. the gasoline prices must first be adjusted for inflation.
C. the theory is widely accepted but cannot be accurately tested.
D. consumers' need for gasoline remains the same regardless of the price.

12. An economic model is:
A. a plastic scaled version of the economy.
B. a complete depiction of reality.
C. an abstraction from reality.
D. applicable to consumer behavior but not to producer behavior.
E. not an accepted tool of the economics profession.

13. Which of the following sayings best reflects the concept of opportunity cost?
A. "You can't teach an old dog new tricks."
B. "There is no such thing as a free lunch."
C. "I have a baker's dozen."
D. "There's no business like show business."

14. The opportunity cost of watching television is:
A. all of the alternative programs that appear on other stations.
B. zero because there is no money expenditure involved.
C. the alternative use of the time foregone by watching the program.
D. zero if it benefits you.

15. Which of the following does not illustrate opportunity cost?
A. If I study, I must give up going to the football game.
B. If I buy a computer, I must do without a 35" television.
C. More consumer spending now means more spending in the future.
D. If I spend more on clothes, I must spend less on food.

16. When deciding whether to buy a second car, marginal analysis indicates that the purchaser should compare the:
A. benefits expected from two cars with the cost of both.
B. additional benefits expected from a second car with the cost of the two cars.
C. dollar cost of the two cars with the potential income that the cars will generate.
D. additional benefits of the second car with the additional cost of the second car.

17. According to marginal analysis, you should spend more time studying economics if the extra benefit from an additional hour of study:
A. is positive.
B. outweighs the extra cost.
C. exceeds the benefits of the previous hour of study.
D. will raise your exam score.

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Economics 400,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in