LAW 122 Lecture 3: Business law 122 fact scenarios (class 3) winter 2016

14 views3 pages
Course
Professor

Document Summary

The defendants were directors of a company that published a statement in its company prospectus that it had obtained government authorization to use a new technology steam. In fact, they had not yet received authorization, although they believed that they would. Relying on the statement in the prospectus, the plaintiff, Authorization for the company to use steam ultimately was denied and the company went bankrupt. The house of lords determined that the elements for the tort of deceit were not satisfied because the directors honestly believed that the company would receive authorization to use steam. Although the directors may have been careless, that is not sufficient to meet the legal test for deceit. It requires knowledge that the statement is not true. Hill v. church of scientology of toronto, [1995] scc. The church of scientology and its lawyer, morris manning, publicly accused casey hill, a crown attorney, of breaching judicial orders sealing certain documents belonging to the church.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions