FAMST 96 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Fourth Wall, Mockumentary, Thesis Statement
9 May 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Analysis should be both global and localized
Consider overall structure of and narrative logic of the film from beginning
to end
â—‹
Entirety of the plot
â—‹
Identify important stylistic details (editing, cinematography, mise-en-
scene, sound, etc.) and examine their role in the narration
â—‹
Contextualize examples within the larger structure of the film
â—‹
Use appropriate terminology and correctly deploy relevant concepts
covered in the readings in class discussions
â—‹
•
Major areas for improvement
Arguments should be concrete and explicit
â—‹
Develop your claims beyond identifying narrative and stylistic
patterns ---> what is the effect of these strategies in the specific scene
analyzed/the film's narration as a whole?
â—‹
Organize your ideas and so each section focuses on a specific
theme/concept
â—‹
WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THE CONCEPTS YOU ARE POINTING OUT IN THE
FILM?
â—‹
Jeff is the one telling how the incident went down
Importance of his perspective?
§
â—‹
Select a limited number of relevant examples and analyze them carefully
Establish a clear connection between each example and the point it
is meant to illustrate
§
Explain how this example is relevant to the overall structure of the
film
§
â—‹
Be mindful of syntax
Speak in a straightforward manner
§
â—‹
Cross cutting between reenactments and mockumentary
Setting up and dismantling knowledge of the story
§
"through a complex narration, the film takes the audience on a
journey of doubt" ….. The spectator has to create their version of a
"truthful" and logical story through their own judgement
§
â—‹
•
Each section of your paper should:
Focus on a specific sub-argument
â—‹
Relate directly to and support your thesis statement
Avoid tangents and cut anything that isn't directly tied to thesis
§
â—‹
Include a clear topic sentence that established the main idea of the
section/paragraph
Topic sentences should articulate your sub-arguments and be
placed near the beginning of each paragraph
§
â—‹
•
Suggestions
The length and context of each section paragraph should be manageable
Limit number of observations included in each section
§
Limit summary
§
â—‹
Provide a detailed explanation/analysis of the most relevant
points/examples for each section
â—‹
Foreground analysis over description
â—‹
•
"the film primarily uses self-consciousness to undermine and layer the
information it presents"
•
DIG DEEP IN LOOKING AT THE CREDIT SEQUENCE•
The film is constantly calling truth into question and the credibility/validity of
the narrators we are given
Breaking of fourth wall
â—‹
Contradiction between narration and image
â—‹
Claims that narrators make that something might be false "that NEVER
happened"
Version of events
§
Obvious that narrators are contradicting what we're seeing
§
Also pointing to the fact that something happened
§
Up to the audience to believe either what they see, what they
hear, or create a narrative of their own and rely on it as truth
§
â—‹
Causes the audience to question the validity and truthfulness of the
story that they end up creating
â—‹
Opening ssequence creating a flaunted gap (gilloolying someone)
â—‹
Say why certain moments selected for evidence are important -- don’t just
mention them
â—‹
•
Section 4 Notes
Tuesday, April 24, 2018
1:03 PM
