SOC SCI H1G Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Deductive Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Modern Philosophy

68 views2 pages

Document Summary

He was a rationalist, reacting against scholasticism (philosophy prevailing through the middle ages) Certainty, deductive logic, a priori (math, for example). Other rationalists after descartes include spinoza and leibniz (calculus) - they want the same sorts of things as descartes. Trying to convince someone of a conclusion. : argument is valid in case the premises entail its conclusion premise is true, but that does not guarantee this conclusion; unrelated. > good argument deductively, as the premises relate to the conclusion. Jones was seen at the scene of the crime by four witnesses 4. > all these premises could be true, but you still could not certainly say that the conclusion is true. In his meditations, descartes wants to tear everything he knows down and rebuild it with truth. He is hoping that there will at least be one thing he can say with certainty. He does not want to think of things in ways that they are not.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents