PHL 101 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Gaunilo Of Marmoutiers, Ontological Argument, Reductio Ad Absurdum

9 views2 pages

Document Summary

The most famous criticism of anselm"s argument was advanced by gaunilo, a monk of marmoutier. Gaunilo replies pro insipiente ( on behalf of the fool") Gaunilo"s reply - he makes 3 points. 1) many things can be in our minds, but this doesn"t make them true (e. g. gossip) 2) you can"t move to argue de re from de dicto. Anselm is saying that people who wish to declare there is no god" have to have an idea in their minds of what god is". Anselm suggests the definition of god is that than which nothing greater can be thought". He then points out that it is greater to exist in reality than in the mind alone. To deny existence to god would be to suggest that god is not the greatest being that can be thought of. God would be lesser in some way when.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents