KP290 Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Scientific Misconduct, Nuremberg Code, Animal Testing

23 views4 pages

Document Summary

Consider the ethics of the research plan. Some researchers hold back data that was found and does not support their thesis. Difference between scientific misconduct and mistakes is intention. Mistake: did not do it on purpose. Most ethics procedures deal with protecting human or animal study participant"s rights. The evolution of ethical principles for research with human participants. Apa develops an ethical code which is rooted in the nuremberg code. Designed to provide guidance to the researcher and protect the participant. All research that involves human subjects or animals requires review and approval by a research ethics board (reb) before the research is started. Reviews all research with humans conducted by faculty, staff, and graduate students. Acts as a liaison to other rebs (school, hospital, social agencies, organizations) Reviews research by undergraduate students who have the intent to publish. Reviews research by undergraduate students that will not be published. The evaluation of risk at the wlu review board.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related textbook solutions

Related Documents