Sociology 2267A/B Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Young Offender, Juvenile Delinquency, Young Offenders Act

13 views9 pages
SOC 2267 650
Week 1: Lesson 2 - Measuring Youth Crime in Canada: An Elusive Challenge
Learning Objectives
Understand the importance of social and historical influences on the evolution of youth
justice and the measuring of youth crime in Canada
Understand how we define youth crime
Recognize that measuring and recording youth crime is influenced by formal social
control mechanisms
Describe some of the facts and trends of youth crime over the past several decades
Understand the strengths and weaknesses of official statistics in relation to self-report
and victimization data
Critically reflect on what the three measurement methods tell us about youth crime as
well as what they do not tell us
Introduction
Typical questions criminologists are asked about youth crime and justice:
1. How serious and how common is it?
2. Is it getting worse?
3. Is the legislation too lenient?
4. Who is committing these criminal and/or deviant acts and why do they do it?
To better understand, explain, and predict youth crime, we must draw from a variety of
sources of measurement:
1. Official accounts of social control (i.e. police, courts, corrections)
2. Unofficial sources (i.e. self report studies, victimization surveys)
Dark figure of crime: incidents of crime/delinquency undetected or
unreported by the police
Youth at risk: Young people at risk of offending or being victimized
Defining Youth Crime
Shifts in concepts and legal terminology
Juvenile delinquency (JDA): Any child who violates any provision of the Criminal
Code or any federal or provincial statue
Young person --> Young offender (YOA/YCJA)
A young offender is a young person who has committed an offence
Counted as "youth crime"
Legal Definition
The traditional focus of criminologists has been on the legal rather than on the
psychological or sociological definitions of youth crime
The legal definition of youth crime focuses primarily on predatory and aggressive
behaviour that is deemed punishable by law
Limitations in Assuming a Purely Legal Definition
Theoretical insight: Exclusion of victimless crime
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
SOC 2267 650
Demographic: Age distribution can affect rates
Case filtration and dismissal: Often eliminated
Policy and administrative curation: Interoperation of YCJA varies among and within
provinces
Method of gathering statistics: Statistics Canada does not enumerate all crimes;
statistics gathered with agenda
Reporting rates: Related to society's attitude
Public perception: Affects the way that legislation is used
Technologies: Complex crimes can do undetected
Measuring Delinquency: A Historical Overview
It is important to have a sense of history about youth crime and youth crime trends
Three periods in Canadian history relating to youth crime and its measurement
Pre-confederation
State intervention
The 20th century
Delinquency Trends: Pre-Confederation to the Nineteenth Century
Pre-Confederation
No reliable official statistics were kept prior to 1876
Accounts of juvenile delinquency were obtainable only through limited
newspaper sources that were often based on observation
The delinquency problem in pre-Confederation Canada cannot be accurately
quantified
What we do know: Boys were disproportionately represented, crime
occurred at higher rates in urban centres, and familial problems were
associated with crime
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
SOC 2267 650
State Intervention: The First Step to Defining and Officially Counting Delinquency
The growth of state intervention in the late-nineteenth century
Urbanization and industrialization
Platt (1977): The "child-saving" movement in the US and Canada
Universal public education and compulsory schooling
Growing concern with addressing "the root causes of delinquent behaviour" 9J.J.
Kelso, W.L. Scott, and the JDA)
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Week 1: lesson 2 - measuring youth crime in canada: an elusive challenge. Defining youth crime: shifts in concepts and legal terminology. Juvenile delinquency (jda): any child who violates any provision of the criminal. Code or any federal or provincial statue: young person --> young offender (yoa/ycja, a young offender is a young person who has committed an offence, counted as "youth crime" Limitations in assuming a purely legal definition: theoretical insight: exclusion of victimless crime. It is important to have a sense of history about youth crime and youth crime trends: three periods in canadian history relating to youth crime and its measurement, pre-confederation, state intervention, the 20th century. 100,000 aged 12-17; and (3) the percentage of change in total youth rate between reporting year and previous year. Demographic facts of young offenders: gender: predominately male. Measuring youth violent and non-violent crime: non-violent crime.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents