SOC316H5 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Takers, Anger Management, Collective Action

58 views3 pages
10 May 2018
School
Department
Course
SOC316 Lecture 5:
Why is the rise of risk in the justice system?
Risk is tied to surveillance
1. Cost using justice system and prisons are expensive
2. Life course persistent offender and SI e a’t sole the issue of rie for all people,
there is no transformative agenda that will help change that person. Problem is how do you
determine who is going to be a life course persistent offender the answer is there is no way
we can figure it out , but we can make that prediction
3. Defensibility proportionality in sentencing , it gives us error of objective, it gets rid of
subjective moral assessments , we have legislation backing us up and telling us what to do, but
now it gives us error of objectivity (pick up that risk so that everyone can understand what that
means)
4. Target and change behaviour things that you can target and use that to change behaviour,
give programs for people with anger management, targeted programs are geared to peoples
aspect of specific behaviour
5. Expansion of electronic databases use of AI in courtrooms, AI tells what the sentence
should e, that idiiduals are akig sujetie deisios, ou do’t at to sa soeoe is
low risk and they go in the environment and go kill people
Limitation of Risk Theory
1. Actuarialism objective and devoid of morality/politics people are elevating risk scores
think about risk in smoking and drinking, that its not moral , good risk takers will be
responsible and not drink that much
2. Actuarial/Risk forms of power replaced older forms its not about transformation
anymore, that we can target these criminiogenic needs, that its not just welfare its also
risk management
3. Risk assumes it acting uniformly across populations claim of X is true for whole group
so to X is tre for each single member, group with delinquent friends more likely to
reoffend, now use that in the risk assessment tool and now this claim becomes true for
each single person, they are not race or gender sensitive
Concluding Comments:
Responsibilization, criminologies of everyday life and risk emergent in shift to neo-
liberalism
Risk thinking is everywhere, this is how we make decisions and evaluate, this is how
institutions think
Risk colonizes the future and uncertainty
Risk guides our actions and interventions
Has implications for crime prevention and justice
What is Community?
Is it spatial when we think about crime preventent strategies we think if its spatial
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents