ECO 1102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Loanable Funds, Tax Credit, Financial Capital

50 views3 pages

tealpanda861

8 Mar 2017

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

roza220x and 38789 others unlocked

ECO 1102 Full Course Notes

Verified Note

46 documents

Document Summary

Purpose of market for loanable funds: brings about the quality between national saving and investment. Financial capital is used to augment and maintain the capital stock. Financial capital finances investment spending and investment spending is spent on the capital stock. Government has policies to try to facilitate more saving which would bring about an increase in the supply of saving and end up with a lower equilibrium interest rate and higher equilibrium quantity of funds. Investment tax credit (not a deduction from the taxable profit but rather a dollar per dollar reduction in the corporate income tax that would otherwise be payable) Current policy debate surrounds further cuts to the corporate income (ie. profit) tax rate. Tax break on investment would increase the incentive to borrow, raising the demand for loanable funds (demand shifts up) End up with a higher equilibrium interest rate and a higher equilibrium level of funds.

Related Questions

Question 3

According to Joseph Schumpeter, the theory of creative destruction describes a process by which

	A	some new products unleash a gale of destruction that drive other new products out of the market.
B		new products unleash a gale of destruction that drives old products out of the market.
C		new products are created by the destruction of capital.
D		the creation of new products never involves the destruction of old products.

Question 4

Which of the following countries had the highest GDP per capita in 2012?

		A Qatar
B		United States
C		Japan
D		Norway

Question 5

________ save a ________ of their income. This ________ capital in their economy and raises economic growth.

	A	Developing countries; large proportion; decreases
B		Developing countries; small proportion; increases
C		High-income countries; large proportion; increases
D		High-income countries; small proportion; increases

Question 6

The demand for loanable funds is determined by the willingness of ________ to borrow money to engage in new investment projects.

A		government
B		households
C		banks
D		firms

Question 7

The U.S. economy has been more stable since 1950.

True

False

Question 8

When the economy reaches a trough in a business cycle, which of the following will occur?

A		Income, production, and employment will continue to fall.
B		Income, production, and employment will begin to rise.
C		Income and production will rise, but employment will continue to fall.
D		Employment rises, but income and production will continue to fall.

Question 9

In a closed economy, what is the relationship between saving and investment?

A		Saving is greater than investment.
B		Investment is greater than saving.
C		Investment is equal to saving.
D		Investment may be greater or smaller than saving.

Question 10

The per-worker production function shows the relationship between ________ per hour worked and ________ per hour worked, holding ________ constant.

A		labor; real GDP; technology
B		capital; real GDP; technology
C		labor; capital; real GDP
D		capital; labor; real GDP

Question 11

New growth theory states that increases in ________ capital will result in ________ at the ________ level.

	A	knowledge; increasing returns to scale; firm
	B	physical; decreasing returns to scale; firm
	C	knowledge; decreasing returns to scale; economy
D		knowledge; increasing returns to scale; economy

Question 12

Which of the following is not a reason why the Industrial Revolution occurred when and where it did?

A		The British government was committed to upholding private property rights.
B		The British government was able to eliminate arbitrary increases in taxes.
C		The British government was able to more easily seize wealth.
D		Institutional changes by the British government helped protect wealth.

Question 13

Growth in real GDP per capita for the world economy was greatest during

A		the seventeenth century.
B		the eighteenth century.
C		the nineteenth century.
D		the twentieth century.

Question 14

Which of the following is a normative statement about economic growth?

A		Economic growth is associated with higher labor productivity growth.
B		Economic growth increases GDP per capita.
C		Economic growth hurts developing countries.
D		Foreign direct investment stimulates economic growth.

Question 15

The effect of a recession on a company like Whirlpool Corporation is such that

A		sales decline more sharply for Whirlpool as compared to firms that do not produce durable goods.
B		profits fall less sharply as compared to firms that do not produce durable goods.
C		the decline in sales is more short-lived as compared to firms that do not produce durable goods.
D		there is no difference in the impact of the recession on its profits as compared to firms that do not produce durable goods.

Question 16

For the recessions in the United States since the 1950s,

A		cyclical unemployment has been non-existent.
B		unemployment rises on average by about 1.2 percentage points 12 months after a recession begins.
C		unemployment falls on average by 2 percentage points 12 months after a recession begins.
D		unemployment rises on average about 5 percentage points 12 months after a recession begins.

Question 17

You are an economic advisor to the president. You are asked to recommend a policy to promote long-term economic growth in the economy. Which of the following policies would you choose?

A		a reduction in sales taxes
B		an investment tax credit
C		a reduction in taxes on luxury yachts
D		All of these

Question 18

In comparison to a government that runs a balanced budget, when the government runs a budget deficit,

	A	the equilibrium interest rate will fall.
	B	business investment will fall.
	C	household savings will fall.
	D	None of these

Question 19

If labor productivity growth slows down in a country, this means that the growth rate in ________ has declined.

A		labor force participation
B		the quantity of goods or services that can be produced by one hour of work
C		the working-age population
D		nominal GDP

Question 20

Policies to promote growth by increasing saving and investment work through

A		decreasing the supply of loanable funds, lowering the interest rate, raising the level of investment in physical capital.
B		increasing the supply of loanable funds, increasing the interest rate, raising the level of investment in physical capital.
C		increasing the supply of loanable funds, lowering the interest rate, lowering the level of investment in physical capital.
D		increasing the supply of loanable funds, lowering the interest rate, raising the level of investment in physical capital.

After reading the article, post substantive comments on the economic impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE TRUMP TAX CUTS

April 25, 2018

The Economic Impact of the Trump Tax Cuts

By Hilary Schmidt, International Banker

On December 22, US President Donald Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The legislation is one of the most radical changes to fiscal policy the United States has undertaken in decades, with sweeping amendments implemented across the entire breadth of the tax code. Indeed, in his State of the Union Address, Trump called it the biggest tax cuts and reforms in American history. As such, its impact is likely to be felt throughout the economy for quite some time to come.

It is arguably the cut in a corporate tax that forms the centrepiece of this new legislation, with the rate being cut from 35 to 21 per cent. That puts the new rate broadly in line with the worldwide average, which as measured by the Tax Foundation across 202 jurisdictions currently stands at 22.96 per cent or 29.41 per cent when weighted by gross domestic product (GDP). Corporations will also stop having to pay corporate tax on any income earned from foreign operations, while such money that is brought back home will be taxed between 8 and 15.5 per cent, significantly lower than the 35-per cent tax they are currently paying.

Republicans believe such substantial cuts will spur a massive influx of business investment that will eventually lead to higher average wages for Americans. For example, Texas Congressman Mike Conaway stated, It's in all of our best interest to have these tax cuts for corporations so that they will have more money to invest in their business and pay their workers. But much of the research conducted thus far suggests otherwise; the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, for instance, recently concluded that workers would receive a maximum of only a quarter of the benefits from tax cuts; and even then, it is most likely to be the higher earners that would be the biggest beneficiaries.

Another piece of evidence to which analysts are pointing is data from S&P Dow Jones Indices, which shows that non-financial companies in the S&P 500 are already flush with cash at the moment, having between them an estimated $1.63 trillion. And despite this vast sum of cash, an investment boom has not transpired. Indeed, some top companies have made it explicitly clear that any tax relief they receive from the reforms will be primarily used to increase dividends and buy back stock to boost share prices. Amgen CEO Robert Bradway, for example, said We've been actively returning capital in the form of growing dividend and buyback, and expect us to continue that. And in terms of what businesses planned to do with any profit returned from abroad, a Bank of America Merrill Lynch survey of more than 300 CEOs found that paying down debt and stock buybacks were by far and away from the biggest priorities for businesses.

The other major pillar of the reform is the cuts that have been enacted for individual income earners, with middle-class taxpayers earning between $19,050 and $77,400 per year receiving a cut in tax from 15 to 12 per cent. Higher-bracket earners, meanwhile, will see their tax rates go from 25 to 22 percent (for incomes between $77,400 and $165,000); 33 to 24 percent ($165,000 to $315,000); and 39.6 to 35 percent ($400,000 to $600,000). And as far as analysis from the Tax Center is concerned, after-tax income will increase by an average of 2.2 per cent across all groups. However, all of this changes after a few years, due to official budget rules that limit the cost of the bill to $1.5 trillion in total which therefore means that to make the corporate tax cuts permanent, the individual tax relief will expire by 2025. As such, a tax increase will likely result by 2027, which, according to projections by the Tax Policy Center, will impact 53 per cent of Americans.

Whether the overall impact will be a net positive or negative for the US economy remains to be seen at this stage, therefore. While most analysis produced to date agrees that economic growth will receive a boost in the short-term, the predictions that have so far come in have been decidedly more mixed and less sure for longer time horizons. The non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation of the US Congress expects the gross domestic product to be 0.8 per cent higher on average each year during the next 10 years than baseline forecasts, thanks mainly to an expected increase in labour supply and business investment. According to the independent non-profit research organisation the Tax Foundation, meanwhile, the plan will primarily reduce marginal tax rates and the cost of capital. In turn, this will lead to a 1.7-per cent rise in GDP over the long-term, a 1.5-per cent increase in wages and a further 339,000 full-time equivalent jobs. This year, moreover, will see GDP growth being posted at 2.45 per cent, compared to baseline growth of 2.01 per cent.

But most analysts see the economic benefits tapering off much sooner than the 10 years asserted by the Joint Committee on Taxation. Goldman Sachs, for example, believes the tax cuts will only slightly boost growth in the short-term before fading quickly. Alec Phillips and Blake Taylor, analysts on Goldman's US economic-analysis team, stated in December that the bank's estimate of the growth effects of the legislation in 2018 and 2019 would be 0.3 per cent per year, before dropping off. Indeed, Phillips and Taylor warn that the legislation may end up damaging the economy in the long run: We note that the effect in 2020 and beyond looks minimal and could be slightly negative.

Some also point to the fact that the cuts will drastically deepen the national debt, with Maya MacGuineas of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimating an additional $1.5 trillion will be added to the $10 trillion already forecast for the next decade. As she explained, Instead of trickling down economic growth, the House plan will unleash a tidal wave of debt that will ultimately slow wage growth and hurt the economy. She seems to have a point the debt today is 77 per cent of GDP, much higher than the 31 per cent in place when the 2001 Bush tax cuts were passed, and the highest it has ever been save for the period just after World War II. What's more, given that interest rates could well rise faster than expected as a result of the likely ballooning of the debt, it may well dampen the expected boost to business-capital expenditure, consumer spending and wage growth.

Indeed, the arbiter of monetary policy itself, the Federal Reserve, has indicated that it remains somewhat unsure of the overall impact of the tax cuts. According to the released minutes of the central bank's December meeting, growth will only modestly be boosted, with members of the Fed's board and presidents of its member regional banks saying they expect real GDP growth of just 2.2-2.6 per cent and a median expectation of 2.5 per cent growth for this year. The comparatively tempered projections are reflective of the debate within the Fed over just how much of a boost business investment and consumer spending will receive from the tax cuts.

According to the minutes, Many participants judged that the proposed changes in business taxes, if enacted, would likely provide a modest boost to capital spending, although the magnitude of the effects was uncertain. While they are highly likely to have a positive effect on economic growth, the Fed also warned that much of the extra cash that is generated is more likely to be utilised for mergers and acquisitions or debt reduction and stock buybacks. Moreover, the boost to consumer spending may have already occurred in part on the back of realised future tax-cut expectations.

Ultimately, it may be too soon to make any firm conclusions about how impactful the tax cuts will eventually be; but given that the US economy is already experiencing strong economic growth, and given that virtually all the signs point to an economy operating at full employment and therefore, at full capacity such sweeping reforms that have been at least partly designed as an economic stimulus could well be dangerous. The impact on inflation and debt may well force the Fed to hike rates more than the three times that back in December it had projected for 2018. Time will tell.

scarletoyster388

1. The primary tool used by supply-side economists to eliminate macroeconomic problems is

A. the discount rate.

B. corporate tax rates.

C. government spending.

D. open market operations.

E. the reserve requirement.

2. When the Federal Reserve System buys government securities on the open market,

A. the money supply will decrease.

B. excess reserves at commercial banks will decrease.

C. excess reserves at commercial banks will increase.

D. interest rates will increase

3. One of the advantages of automatic stabilizers over discretionary fiscal policy is that automatic stabilizers

A. has a greater multiplier effect than discretionary policy.

B. is not subject to the time lag problems of discretionary policy.

C. does not produce a deficit during recessions as a discretionary policy does.

D. makes the actual budget a better reflection of the condition of the economy than the full-employment budget.

4. "I have promised to do everything in my power to reduce the federal deficit. That means reducing federal expenditures and, if necessary, increasing taxes. Under present conditions of full employment and steady prices, we can afford to bear the burden of this debt (i.e., pay off the debt) now instead of passing it on to our children and grandchildren."

If the policies of the Senator quoted above were adopted, what effects would be expected while these policies were being implemented?

A. higher inflation

B. increases imports

C. higher rates of economic growth

D. increased unemployment and idle capacity

5. An inflationary gap can be reduced or completely closed by

A. decreasing taxes while leaving government spending on goods and services unchanged.

B. decreasing government spending on goods and services while leaving taxes unchanged.

C. increasing government spending on goods and services while leaving taxes unchanged.

D. increasing both government spending on goods and services and taxes by the same amount.

6. Compared to fiscal policy, an advantage of monetary policy is its

A. greater flexibility.

B. highly selective impact on segments of the economy.

C. ability to eliminate cost-push inflation.

D. need for approval by Congress.

E. need for approval by the President.

7. An increase in government spending on goods and services which causes a budget deficit to exist

A. is always inflationary.

B. is more inflationary than equal increases in private spending.

C. is usually not inflationary when the economy is operating at its full-employment level of output.

D. will not necessarily cause serious inflation as long as there are unemployed resources in the economy.

8. Some analysts believe the tax cuts enacted during the President H.W. Bush administration represented a supply-side economic policy rather than a Keynesian fiscal policy because

A. the tax cuts were accompanied by decreases in interest rates.

B. the tax cuts were accompanied by increases in government spending.

C. the tax cuts were primarily aimed at upper-income groups and businesses.

D. the tax cuts were primarily aimed at middle income and lower-income groups.

9. When the federal government is stabilizing the economy by increasing taxes, monetary authorities should

A. take actions to decrease interest rates.

B. increase the supply of money.

C. buy government securities in the open market.

D. follow an expansionary money policy.

E. follow a contractionary money policy.

10. Suppose a commercial bank has demand deposits (checking accounts) of $400,000, actual reserves of $170,000, and a reserve requirement of 20%. This single commercial bank can lend a maximum of ______ and the banking system can increase loans by a maximum of ______

A. $90,000 and $450,000.
B. $90,000 and $360,000.
C. $90,000 and $170,000.
D. $170,000 and $450,000.

E. both can lend an unlimited amount.

11. Which of the following would most likely result if the federal government increased its spending without changing tax revenues during a period of full employment?

A. inflation

B. a recession

C. lower interest rates

D. a larger net exports deficit

12. Fiscal policy that emphasizes cutting taxes as a means of improving incentives to work, and invest would be characterized in aggregate demand - aggregate supply framework primarily a shift

A. left in the aggregate demand curve.

B. left in the aggregate supply curve.

C. right in the aggregate supply curve.

D. no shift in either the aggregate demand curve or the aggregate supply curve.

13. Which of the following will result in the greatest increase in aggregate expenditures/demand?

A. A $100 decrease in personal income taxes

B. A $100 increase in personal income taxes

C. A $100 increase in government expenditures

D. A $100 increase in government expenditures which is accompanied by a $100 increase in personal income taxes

E. Both A and C will have the same effect on aggregate expenditures

14. You are given the following information about aggregate demand for an economy: (1)consumption = $600 billion; (2) investment = $50 billion; (3) government purchases = $100 billion; and (4) net export = $20 billion. If the full-employment level of GDP for this economy is $720 billion, then what combination of actions would be most consistent to achieve full employment and stable prices?

A. an increase in government spending and taxes

B. decrease government spending and taxes

C. decrease government spending and increase taxes

D. increase government spending and decrease taxes

15. Advocates of fiscal policy agree that discretionary fiscal policy will stabilize the business cycle most when the federal government

A. continuously incurs budget deficits.

B. continuously runs budget surpluses.

C. balances its budget every year.

D. incurs budget deficits during recessions and budget surpluses during demand-pull inflations.

E. incurs budget surpluses during recessions and budget deficits during demand-pull inflations.

16. Discretionary fiscal policy that increases the government budget deficit has the same effect on equilibrium as

A. an increase in personal saving.

B. an increase in business investment.

C. a decrease in government spending.

D. a decrease in personal consumption expenditures

pearseal757

ECO 1102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Loanable Funds, Tax Credit, Financial Capital

ECO 1102 Full Course Notes

Document Summary

Get access

Related textbook solutions

Principles of Economics

Principles of Macroeconomics

Principles of Microeconomics

Related Documents

ECO 1102 Lecture 10: Supply and Demand of Loanable Funds

ECO 1102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Autarky, Root Mean Square, Government Debt

ECO 1102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Loanable Funds, Demand Curve

Related Questions