POLS 3130 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Ultra Vires, Precedent, Canadian Federalism

20 views3 pages

Document Summary

E(cid:272)o(cid:373)(cid:373)e(cid:374)datio(cid:374)s al(cid:449)ays i(cid:374)(cid:272)orporated (cid:449)ithout (cid:373)odifi(cid:272)atio(cid:374) i(cid:374) the cro(cid:449)(cid:374)(cid:859)s de(cid:272)isio(cid:374). Not bound by the doctrine of stare decisis. The jcpc and canadian federalism: o(cid:448)erturning macdonald"s vision. Undermined plans for a highly centralized federation. Appeals continued until 1949: canadian federalism was defined by individuals that had no practical knowledge of federalism or of canada. Intentio(cid:374)s of the (cid:858)fou(cid:374)di(cid:374)g fathers(cid:859: ensure that the federal parliament received the majority of powers, residual power, provincial powers were narrowly defined, ambiguous phraseology contributes to the provincial expansion of power. Insurance company argues that ontario statute regulating fire insurance policy was ultra vires. (outside of the constitution: only parliament could regulate trade and commerce. Valid exercise of the federal parlia(cid:373)e(cid:374)t(cid:859)s po(cid:449)er to legislate for the (cid:862)pea(cid:272)e, order a(cid:374)d good. The constitution provides the provinces with the power to: regulate liquor traffic within provincial boundaries. Impose penalties for the violation of the law: delegate power to municipal governments. 1885: power to issue liquor licenses given to the provinces.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents