PHIL 105 Lecture 18: Lecture 18

23 views6 pages

Document Summary

Questions: suppose a is correlated with b in population p, does it follow that b is correlated with. A in population p? answer: no this doesn"t follow: if a is correlated with b, does it follow that a causes b? answer: no this doesn"t follow. Establishing a correlation is not suf cient for establishing causation. This should be apparent from the fact that if a is correlated with b, then b is correlated with a. Correlation statements amount to conjunctions of two simple statistical statements, so two surgery arguments can be used to support them. This is indirectly supported by the background information): target correlation in sample (2,3) (the percentage of a that are b and the percentage of a that are not b). !1: representativeness premise (indirectly supported by the background information), final conclusion (4,5) (proving that there is a correlation between for example, a and b). The same considerations apply here as to simple surgery arguments.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions