PSYC 304 Lecture Notes - Lecture 15: Information Integration, Negativity Bias, Domain Theory
14 Nov 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
If you"re using outcomes, you"d say john was naughtier because he broke more cups, even though it was by accident. Children younger than 5-6 years say john. Focused on the outcome: why do children fail piaget"s morality task? (1) value outcome over intentions (2) task demands. Not super salient that the first case was accident and second was bad. Second one was actually bad for breaking rule the cup breaking was an accident. Outcome not negative, but the intent was: person who helps you by accident. Outcome was positive, but intent was not: person who tried to help you and failed. Outcome was negative, but intent was not: vaish et al. , 2008. Recipient is wearing a colourful beaded necklace and belt. There is a second beaded necklace and belt in the tray. There are papers and drawing pencils on the table. Recipient introduces actor and neutral person as her friend. (1) showed off a beaded necklace she was wearing.
