EDUC 240 Lecture 41: lecture 41
3 Jun 2020
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Results: the effect on the business or the work environment by the trainee, methods: expenses, revenues, sales, and other existing business measures. Kirkpatrick level one, but only to improve the overall efforts, not necessarily to improve performance (bloom, 2003). Kirkpatrick"s guidelines are not without critics: doubt about the validity, no evidence of correlation between the levels. Insufficiently diagnostic: reliance on the same variables and outcome measures, lack of clarity, what is meant by learning, not a one-size-fits-all model. Four models of training evaluation (con"t: coma model. A training evaluation model that involves the measurement of four types of variables: cognitive, organizational environment, motivation, attitudes. The coma model improves on kirkpatrick"s model in three ways: integrates a greater number of measures, measures are causally related to training success, defines variables with greater precision. Four models of training evaluation (con"t: decision-based evaluation model. Recall holton"s ltsi from lesson 5 transfer of training.
