76516 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Berlin Outer Ring, Gold Bar, De Facto
Document Summary
If so, then the s79(4)(a)-(c)/ 90sm(4)(d)-(g) factors become relevant - assess the parties" contributions. In mallet, the high court rejected the notion of a starting point of equal contribution. That will be appropriate only to the extent that the respective contributions of the parties are each made to an e(cid:395)ui(cid:448)ale(cid:374)t deg(cid:396)ee. (cid:863) Noris: the fla does not prohibit equating home maker and financial contributions: Ferraro: mallet: homemaker is substantial and not token. Money (1994: fogarty j posed the erosion principle: that the contribution of a party in. It is not so much a matter of erosion of contribution but a question of what weight is to be attached, in all the circumstances, to the initial contributions. It is necessary to weigh the initial contributions by a party with all the other relevant contributions of both the husband and the wife. Regard must be had to the use made by the parties to the contribution.
