MLL217 Study Guide - Final Guide: Capital Asset, Firewatch, Westpac

91 views7 pages
Key Concepts Underpinning the Australian Consumer Law
ACL breakdown
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
ss 1-17
Pt 2-1 ss 18-19
Pt 2-2 ss 20-22A
Pt 2-3 ss 23-28
Pt 3-1 ss 29-50
Pt 3-2 ss 51- 103
Pt 3-3 ss 104 - 133
Pt 3-4 ss 134-137
Pt 3-5 ss 138-150
Pt 4-1 ss 151-168
Pt 4-2 ss 169- 193
Pt 4-3 ss 194 - 202
Pt 4-4 ss 203 - 206
Pt 4-5 ss 205-206
Pt 4-6 ss 207 - 211
Pt 4-7 ss 212- 217
Pt 5-1 ss 218- 223
Pt 5-2 ss 224-253
Pt 5-3 ss 254-258
Pt 5-4 ss 259-277
Pt 5-5 ss 278-287
Key part of the regulatory reforms of the Council of Australian Governments
(COAG) to deliver a seamless national economy
Replaces provisions spread across 17 State and Territory Acts and in the
Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA)
Came into effect on 1 January 2011
Each state and territory has enacted legislation applying the ACL
See, for example, Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic)
-Includes persons AND Corporations
Textbook
Background to the ACL
The legislative basis of the ACL
The ACL as a law of the Commonwealth
The ACL as State or Territory law
Policy objectives
Henjo Investments v Collins Marrickville (No 1)
Misleading conduct by silence
Sold a restaurant, seating for 124 but only held a permit for 96.
When the council came along they had to remove the difference
in seating. Made a difference to profitability
While it was literally true that is could seat 124, it was
misleading
Act enacted to stamp out improper commerce in trade or
commerce
Henville v Walker
Lack of further enquiry
Now s 82 applies, ability to claim contribution
Held that part to blame, but recovered all costs
ACL is contained in Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
Is applied as a law of the Commonwealth & each State and Territory will also
make the ACL a law of its jurisdiction so that the same provisions will apply
across Australia
Modelled on the existing consumer protection provisions of the Trade
Practices Act but with some modifications.
Enforced by all Australian courts and tribunals, including the courts and
tribunals of the States and Territories
Is administered by the ACCC and each State and Territorys consumer law
agency
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 7 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Generally reflected in similar provisions in the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission Act 2001 (ASIC Act), so that financial products and
services are treated in the same way.
The ACL comprises uniform provisions relating to, inter alia:
- Misleading conduct and other false representations
- Product liability and product safety enforcement
Enforcement and remedial powers
Extraterritorial application
- Each state and territorial legislation provide greater provisions to be applied
Double punishment prevented through ACCC and state/territory legislation
BUT 2 limitations on s 18:
Trade or commerce requirement
E.g. Orion Pet Products v RSPCA
Protection for media organisations (see Topic 11)
Key concepts under the CCA
The CCA applies to corporations
NB: the state and territory Acts do impose obligations on all persons
The corporation must be a foreign, trading, or financial corporation, or a
holding company thereof.
Section 4(1) CCA
A trading corporation
A substantial or sufficiently significant part of the corporations activities
must be trading activities; must be more than peripheral
NB: A trading activity means the acquisition and supply of goods and
services for reward.
A not for profit organisation might be a trading corporation
E v Australian Red Cross Society
Plaintiff contracted AIDS during blood transfusion (ARCS
was responsible for the blood)
Court held that: was a trading corporation, despite the
practically free transaction of blood.
(Not misleading conduct)
Orion Pet Products Pty Ltd v RSPCA (Vic)
Hughes v WACA
Boycott contravened TPA ??
Just because it trades does not mean it is a trading
corporation
Contrast with amateur sporting clubs
The substantial current activities test
For
Hughes v WACA
R v Federal Court of Australia; ex parte WAFL
SGIO v GIO
TPC v Legion Cabs (trading) Co-operative Society Ltd
Against
McCarthy v Australian Rough Riders Association Inc
Bradken Consolidated Ltd v BHP
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 7 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Pt 5-5 ss 278-287: key part of the regulatory reforms of the council of australian governments (coag) to deliver a (cid:1684)seamless national economy(cid:1685, replaces provisions spread across 17 state and territory acts and in the. Trade practices act 1974 (tpa: came into effect on 1 january 2011, each state and territory has enacted legislation applying the acl, see, for example, fair trading act 1999 (vic) Sold a restaurant, seating for 124 but only held a permit for 96. When the council came along they had to remove the difference in seating. While it was literally true that is could seat 124, it was misleading. Act enacted to stamp out improper commerce in trade or commerce: henville v walker, lack of further enquiry. Now s 82 applies, ability to claim contribution. Held that part to blame, but recovered all costs: acl is contained in schedule 2 of the competition and consumer act 2010.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents